Branding/Logomark minus Citation Combined Shape Icon/Bookmark-empty Icon/Copy Icon/Collection Icon/Close Copy 7 no author result Created with Sketch. Icon/Back Created with Sketch. Match!

Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups

Published on May 17, 2019in Perspectives on medical education
· DOI :10.1007/s40037-019-0515-4
Brent Thoma15
Estimated H-index: 15
,
Teresa M. Chan16
Estimated H-index: 16
Cite
Abstract
Introduction It is often necessary to demonstrate the impact of a research program over time both within and beyond institutions. However, it is difficult to accurately track the publications of research groups over time without significant effort. A simple, scalable, and economical way to track publications from research groups and their metrics would address this challenge.
  • References (7)
  • Citations (0)
Cite
References7
Newest
Published on Mar 7, 2019in Academic Emergency Medicine 2.96
Teresa M. Chan16
Estimated H-index: 16
(McMaster University),
Damon R. Kuehl4
Estimated H-index: 4
(VT: Virginia Tech)
Published on Mar 1, 2018
Robert A. Woods6
Estimated H-index: 6
,
Teresa M. Chan16
Estimated H-index: 16
+ 1 AuthorsJonathan S. Ilgen21
Estimated H-index: 21
Published on Dec 1, 2016in BMC Medicine 8.29
Trisha Greenhalgh74
Estimated H-index: 74
(University of Oxford),
James Raftery40
Estimated H-index: 40
(Southampton General Hospital)
+ 1 AuthorsMatthew Glover13
Estimated H-index: 13
(Brunel University London)
Impact occurs when research generates benefits (health, economic, cultural) in addition to building the academic knowledge base. Its mechanisms are complex and reflect the multiple ways in which knowledge is generated and utilised. Much progress has been made in measuring both the outcomes of research and the processes and activities through which these are achieved, though the measurement of impact is not without its critics. We review the strengths and limitations of six established approaches...
Published on Feb 1, 2016in Scientometrics 2.77
Anne-Wil Harzing45
Estimated H-index: 45
(Middlesex University),
Satu Alakangas4
Estimated H-index: 4
(University of Melbourne)
This article aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive comparison of the coverage of the three major bibliometric databases: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science. Based on a sample of 146 senior academics in five broad disciplinary areas, we therefore provide both a longitudinal and a cross-disciplinary comparison of the three databases. Our longitudinal comparison of eight data points between 2013 and 2015 shows a consistent and reasonably stable quarterly growth for both publicat...
Published on Dec 1, 2006in Biomedical Digital Libraries
Nisa Bakkalbasi5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Yale University),
Kathleen Bauer4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Yale University)
+ 1 AuthorsLei Wang1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Yale University)
Background Researchers turn to citation tracking to find the most influential articles for a particular topic and to see how often their own published papers are cited. For years researchers looking for this type of information had only one resource to consult: the Web of Science from Thomson Scientific. In 2004 two competitors emerged – Scopus from Elsevier and Google Scholar from Google. The research reported here uses citation analysis in an observational study examining these three databases...
Published on Dec 1, 2006in Biomedical Digital Libraries
Judy F. Burnham7
Estimated H-index: 7
(USA: University of South Alabama)
The Scopus database provides access to STM journal articles and the references included in those articles, allowing the searcher to search both forward and backward in time. The database can be used for collection development as well as for research. This review provides information on the key points of the database and compares it to Web of Science. Neither database is inclusive, but complements each other. If a library can only afford one, choice must be based in institutional needs.
Published on Apr 1, 2003in Research in Higher Education 1.96
Robert K. Toutkoushian22
Estimated H-index: 22
(University System of New Hampshire),
Stephen R. Porter22
Estimated H-index: 22
(Wesleyan University)
+ 1 AuthorsPaula R. Hollis2
Estimated H-index: 2
(University System of New Hampshire)
Studies that attempt to evaluate and rank institutions often overlook the research activities of an institution. In this article, we show how readily available data from the Institute of Scientific Inquiry (ISI) may be used to estimate the number of scholarly articles written by an institution's faculty. We show how institutions are ranked according to total publications and the ratio of publications to full-time faculty, how these measures vary by type of institution, and how they are correlate...
Cited By0
Newest