Review paper
What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research
Abstract
We review the literature on evidence-based best practices on how to enhance methodological transparency, which is the degree of detail and disclosure about the specific steps, decisions, and judgment calls made during a scientific study. We conceptualize lack of transparency as a “research performance problem” because it masks fraudulent acts, serious errors, and questionable research practices, and therefore precludes inferential and results...
Paper Details
Title
What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research
Published Date
Jan 1, 2018
Journal
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
83 - 110
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History