Branding/Logomark minus Citation Combined Shape Icon/Bookmark-empty Icon/Copy Icon/Collection Icon/Close Copy 7 no author result Created with Sketch. Icon/Back Created with Sketch. Match!
Herman Aguinis
George Washington University
196Publications
54H-index
10.9kCitations
Publications 196
Newest
Published on May 22, 2019in Academy of Management Perspectives 4.69
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
Chailin Cummings2
Estimated H-index: 2
(LBSU: California State University, Long Beach)
+ 1 AuthorsThomas G. Cummings21
Estimated H-index: 21
(SC: University of Southern California)
Source Cite
Published on Apr 2, 2019in Strategic Management Journal 5.48
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
Angelo M. Solarino2
Estimated H-index: 2
(University of Leeds)
Research Summary We used interviews with elite informants as a case study to illustrate the need to expand the discussion of transparency and replicability to qualitative methodology. An analysis of 52 articles published in Strategic Management Journal revealed that none of them were sufficiently transparent to allow for exact replication, empirical replication, or conceptual replication. We offer 12 transparency criteria, and behaviorally‐anchored ratings scales to measure them, that can be use...
1 Citations Source Cite
Published on Apr 1, 2019in Organizational Research Methods 4.92
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
Ravi S. Ramani3
Estimated H-index: 3
(Purdue University),
Isabel Villamor (GW: George Washington University)
We analyze the trajectory of Organizational Research Methods (ORM) during the first 20 years of its existence (i.e., 1998-2017). First, beginning with the inaugural volume, we review the editorials to create a qualitative account regarding ORM’s journey as narrated by the journal’s leaders in their own voices. Second, we examine the composition of the five senior editorial teams (i.e., editors and associate editors), including their qualitative-quantitative, micro-macro, and disciplinary orienta...
Source Cite
Published on Mar 13, 2019in Organizational Research Methods 4.92
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
N. Sharon Hill8
Estimated H-index: 8
(GW: George Washington University),
James R. Bailey16
Estimated H-index: 16
(GW: George Washington University)
We offer best-practice recommendations for journal reviewers, editors, and authors regarding data collection and preparation. Our recommendations are applicable to research adopting different epistemological and ontological perspectives—including both quantitative and qualitative approaches—as well as research addressing micro (i.e., individuals, teams) and macro (i.e., organizations, industries) levels of analysis. Our recommendations regarding data collection address (a) type of research desig...
Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2019in Personnel Psychology 5.52
Thomas W. H. Ng40
Estimated H-index: 40
(HKU: University of Hong Kong),
Kai Chi Yam1
Estimated H-index: 1
(NUS: National University of Singapore),
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University)
5 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2019in Journal of Management 8.08
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
Ante Glavas9
Estimated H-index: 9
(KEDGE Business School)
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) focuses on many types of stakeholders and outcomes, including stakeholders outside of the organization and outcomes that go beyond financial results. Thus, CSR expands the notion of work to go beyond a task, job, intraindividual, intraorganizational, and profit perspective and provides an ideal conduit for individuals to seek and find meaningfulness through work. We adopt a person-centric conceptualization of CSR by focusing on sensemaking as an underlying a...
23 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2019in Psychometrika 2.09
Steven Andrew Culpepper13
Estimated H-index: 13
,
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University)
+ 1 AuthorsRoger E. Millsap40
Estimated H-index: 40
(ASU: Arizona State University)
The existence of differences in prediction systems involving test scores across demographic groups continues to be a thorny and unresolved scientific, professional, and societal concern. Our case study uses a two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator to jointly assess measurement invariance and prediction invariance in high-stakes testing. So, we examined differences across groups based on latent as opposed to observed scores with data for 176 colleges and universities from The College Board. Res...
Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2019in Academy of Management Learning and Education 2.87
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University),
Ravi S. Ramani3
Estimated H-index: 3
(Purdue University)
+ 2 AuthorsJoowon Lee1
Estimated H-index: 1
(GW: George Washington University)
Scholarly impact is typically conceptualized and measured as an internal exchange that occurs among researchers in the form of citations in journal articles. We offer an expanded conceptualization and measurement of scholarly impact by investigating knowledge transfer to a critical management education constituency: students. To do so, we investigated which sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journals, business periodicals); individual items (e.g., journal articles, book chapters); and authors are most...
2 Citations Source Cite
Published on Feb 1, 2019in Journal of Business and Psychology 2.58
Kevin R. Murphy52
Estimated H-index: 52
(UL: University of Limerick),
Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University)
The practice of hypothesizing after results are known (HARKing) has been identified as a potential threat to the credibility of research results. We conducted simulations using input values based on comprehensive meta-analyses and reviews in applied psychology and management (e.g., strategic management studies) to determine the extent to which two forms of HARKing behaviors might plausibly bias study outcomes and to examine the determinants of the size of this effect. When HARKing involves cherr...
3 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2019in Business Horizons 2.59
Hannah Kremer (GW: George Washington University), Isabel Villamor (GW: George Washington University), Herman Aguinis54
Estimated H-index: 54
(GW: George Washington University)
Innovation—the implementation of creative ideas—is one of the most important factors of competitive advantage in 21st century organizations. Yet, leaders do not always encourage employee behaviors that are critical for innovation. We integrate existing literature on the critical factors that serve as antecedents of innovation, including employee voice and knowledge sharing, which in turn lead to creativity and innovation. Based on existing empirical research, we offer evidence-based recommendati...
Source Cite
12345678910