Revisiting the trustworthiness–trust relationship: Exploring the differential predictors of cognition‐ and affect‐based trust
Abstract
Summary We seek to develop a better understanding of interpersonal trust by bridging the gap between two heretofore distinct paradigms of trust. One paradigm views trust in terms of two dimensions: cognition‐ and affect‐based. The other paradigm views trust as being distinct from trustworthiness, which has four dimensions: ability, behavioral integrity, benevolence, and values congruence. Currently, theoretical consensus is lacking about the...
Paper Details
Title
Revisiting the trustworthiness–trust relationship: Exploring the differential predictors of cognition‐ and affect‐based trust
Published Date
Jun 1, 2020
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
535 - 550
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History