Original paper
Trends and predictors of biomedical research quality, 1990–2015: a meta-research study
Abstract
To measure the frequency of adequate methods, inadequate methods and poor reporting in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and test potential factors associated with adequacy of methods and reporting.Retrospective analysis of RCTs included in Cochrane reviews. Time series describes the proportion of RCTs using adequate methods, inadequate methods and poor reporting. A multinomial logit model tests potential factors associated with...
Paper Details
Title
Trends and predictors of biomedical research quality, 1990–2015: a meta-research study
Published Date
Sep 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e030342 - e030342
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History