Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges

Published on Dec 1, 2019in Scientific Reports4.011
· DOI :10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4
Valerio Capraro18
Estimated H-index: 18
(Lond: University of London),
Glorianna Jagfeld2
Estimated H-index: 2
(University of Stuttgart)
+ 2 AuthorsIris van de Pol2
Estimated H-index: 2
(UvA: University of Amsterdam)
The conflict between pro-self and pro-social behaviour is at the core of many key problems of our time, as, for example, the reduction of air pollution and the redistribution of scarce resources. For the well-being of our societies, it is thus crucial to find mechanisms to promote pro-social choices over egoistic ones. Particularly important, because cheap and easy to implement, are those mechanisms that can change people’s behaviour without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives, the so-called “nudges”. Previous research has found that moral nudges (e.g., making norms salient) can promote pro-social behaviour. However, little is known about whether their effect persists over time and spills across context. This question is key in light of research showing that pro-social actions are often followed by selfish actions, thus suggesting that some moral manipulations may backfire. Here we present a class of simple moral nudges that have a great positive impact on pro-sociality. In Studies 1–4 (total N = 1,400), we use economic games to demonstrate that asking subjects to self-report “what they think is the morally right thing to do” does not only increase pro-sociality in the choice immediately after, but also in subsequent choices, and even when the social context changes. In Study 5, we explore whether moral nudges promote charity donations to humanitarian organisations in a large (N = 1,800) crowdfunding campaign. We find that, in this context, moral nudges increase donations by about 44 percent.
  • References (104)
  • Citations (5)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Citations
1 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Sean A. DennisH-Index: 1
#2Brian M. GoodsonH-Index: 1
Last. Chris PearsonH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
9 CitationsSource
#1Andrea Larney (U of G: University of Guelph)H-Index: 1
#2Amanda Rotella (U of G: University of Guelph)H-Index: 1
Last. Pat Barclay (U of G: University of Guelph)H-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Are people more generous when less money is at stake? The Ultimatum Game (UG) and Dictator Game (DG) are often used as models of bargaining and charitable giving, respectively. Previous studies have produced conflicting results on whether UG and DG offers are lower when the stakes are high, and many previous studies had insufficient statistical power to detect significant effects of stake size. To resolve this, we conducted a meta-analysis of 31 existing studies that manipulated the siz...
7 CitationsSource
#1Valerio Capraro (Middlesex University)H-Index: 18
#2Andrea VanzoH-Index: 2
Understanding whether preferences are sensitive to the frame has been a major topic of debate in the last decades. For example, several works have explored whether the dictator game in the give frame gives rise to a different rate of pro-sociality than the same game in the take frame, leading to mixed results. Here we contribute to this debate with two experiments. In Study 1 (N=567) we implement an extreme dictator game in which the dictator either gets $0.50 and the recipient gets nothing, or ...
11 CitationsSource
#1Ben M. Tappin (RHUL: Royal Holloway, University of London)H-Index: 4
#2Valerio Capraro (Middlesex University)H-Index: 18
Prosociality is fundamental to human social life, and, accordingly, much research has attempted to explain human prosocial behavior. Capraro and Rand (Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 99-111, 2018) recently provided experimental evidence that prosociality in anonymous, one-shot interactions (such as Prisoner’s Dilemma and Dictator Game experiments) is not driven by outcome-based social preferences – as classically assumed – but by a generalized morality preference for “doing the right thing”. H...
29 CitationsSource
#1Pablo Brañas-Garza (LUC: Loyola University Chicago)H-Index: 23
#2Valerio Capraro (Middlesex University)H-Index: 18
Last. Ericka Rascon-Ramirez (Middlesex University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Whether or not there are gender differences in altruistic behaviour in Dictator Game experiments has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Earlier studies found women to be more altruistic than men. However, this conclusion has been challenged by more recent accounts, which have argued that gender differences in altruistic behaviour may be a peculiarity of student samples and may not extend to random samples. Here we study gender differences in altruistic behaviour and, additionally,...
41 CitationsSource
Decades of experimental research show that some people forgo personal gains to benefit others in unilateral anonymous interactions. To explain these results, behavioral economists typically assume that people have social preferences for minimizing inequality and/or maximizing efficiency (social welfare). Here we present data that cannot be explained by these standard social preference models. We use a “Trade-Off Game†(TOG), where players unilaterally choose between an equitable option and an...
38 CitationsSource
#1Amanda Grindheim Reigstad (University of Bergen)H-Index: 1
#2Eirik Strømland (University of Bergen)H-Index: 2
Last. Gustav Tinghög (Linköping University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
This paper studies whether individual cooperation is stable across settings and over time. Involving more than 7,000 subjects on two different continents, this study documents positive correlation in cooperative behavior across economic games in Norway, Sweden, Austria and the United States. The game measures also correlate with a tendency to make deontological judgments in moral dilemmas, and display of general trust toward strangers. Using time-variation in the data, we test whether temporal s...
7 CitationsSource
#1James AndreoniH-Index: 48
#2Justin M. RaoH-Index: 13
Last. Hannah TrachtmanH-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
If people enjoy giving, then why do they avoid fund-raisers? Partnering with the Salvation Army at Christmastime, we conducted a randomized field experiment placing bell ringers at one or both main entrances to a supermarket, making it easy or difficult to avoid the ask. Additionally, bell ringers either were silent or said “please give.” Making avoidance difficult increased both the rate of giving and donations. Paradoxically, the verbal ask dramatically increased giving but also led to dramati...
48 CitationsSource
#1Giovanna d’Adda (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 7
#2Valerio Capraro (Middlesex University)H-Index: 18
Last. Massimo Tavoni (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Policy interventions are generally evaluated for their direct effectiveness. Little is known about their ability to persist over time and spill across contexts. These latter aspects can reinforce or offset the direct impacts depending on the policy instrument choice. Through an online experiment with 1486 subjects, we compare four widely used policy instruments in terms of their ability to enforce a norm of fairness in the Dictator Game, and to persist over time (i.e., to a subsequent untreated ...
18 CitationsSource
#1Matjaz Perc (University of Maribor)H-Index: 80
#2Jillian J. Jordan (Yale University)H-Index: 9
Last. Attila Szolnoki (MTA: Hungarian Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 56
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Extensive cooperation among unrelated individuals is unique to humans, who often sacrifice personal benefits for the common good and work together to achieve what they are unable to execute alone. The evolutionary success of our species is indeed due, to a large degree, to our unparalleled other-regarding abilities. Yet, a comprehensive understanding of human cooperation remains a formidable challenge. Recent research in the social sciences indicates that it is important to focus on the...
347 CitationsSource
Cited By5
#1J.J. van BavelH-Index: 1
#1Jay J. Van Bavel (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 29
Last. J.N. DruckmanH-Index: 1
view all 42 authors...
The COVID-19 pandemic represents a massive, global health crisis. Because the crisis requires large-scale behavior change and poses significant psychological burdens on individuals, insights from the social and behavioural sciences are critical for optimizing pandemic response. Here we review relevant research from a diversity of research areas relevant to different dimensions of pandemic response. We review foundational work on navigating threats, social and cultural factors, science communicat...
12 CitationsSource
#1Eileen Y. Chou (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 13
#2Dennis Y. Hsu (HKU: University of Hong Kong)
Last. Eileen Hernon (UVA: University of Virginia)
view all 3 authors...
Prosocial organizations increasingly rely on e-pledges to promote their causes and secure commitment. Yet their effectiveness is controversial. Epitomized by UNICEF's "Likes Don't Save Lives" campaign, the threat of slacktivism has led some organizations to forsake social media as a potential platform for garnering commitment. We proposed and investigated a novel e-pledging method that may enable organizations to capitalize on the benefits of e-pledging without compromising on its mass outreach ...
#1Valerio Capraro (Middlesex University)H-Index: 18
#2Ismael Rodriguez-Lara (UGR: University of Granada)
Last. Maria J. Ruiz-Martos (Chapman University)
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Recent work highlights that cooperation in the one-shot Prisoner's dilemma (PD) is primarily driven by moral preferences for doing the right thing, rather than social preferences for equity or efficiency. To our knowledge, nothing is known on whether moral preferences affect cooperation in the Stag-Hunt Game (SHG). Cooperation in the SHG fundamentally differs from cooperation in the PD in that it is not costly, but risky: players have no temptation to deviate from the cooperative outcom...
#1Hezhi Chen (ZJU: Zhejiang University)
#2Zhijia Zeng (Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics)
Last. Jianhong Ma (ZJU: Zhejiang University)
view all 3 authors...
Punishment aims to deter individuals’ selfish behaviors, but it can occasionally backfire. Some scholars have proposed promoting prosocial behaviors using punishment that communicates positive social norms because it provides additional motivation. However, it is unclear which factors affect the norm expressive function of punishment. This study proposes that third-party punishment communicates more positive normative information, and thus, promotes more prosocial behavior in observers than does...
Despite several decades of research on more effectively communicating climate change to the general public, there is only limited knowledge about how older adults engage with an issue that will shape and define future generations. We focus on two key factors that may motivate younger and older adults to engage in climate change action, legacy concern and place attachment, and assess whether older adults differ in any appreciable way from the general population in this domain. We randomly exposed...
#1Jiayang XuH-Index: 2
Last. Jiayun ZengH-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Sustainability issues have gained growing awareness in recent years. Governments play an important role in environment and resources problems since they can affect enterprises’ production activities by enacting policies and regulations. To promote green production in the long term associated with the consideration of financial intervention of governments, we establish a three-population model of suppliers, manufacturers and governments based on evolutionary game theory, and analyze the evolution...
1 CitationsSource
#1Xinyu Nie (SJTU: Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
#2Han Lin (Nanjing Audit University)H-Index: 6
view all 5 authors...
Altruism, which is crucial to human beings and society, can be spontaneously aroused by environmental factors. The mechanism behind the influence on altruism remains debated. This research finds that different colors can alter the altruistic behaviors of people. Specifically, blue enhances altruism, whereas red functions conversely. We argue that different colors can simulate changes in information acquisition and then lead to the corresponding behaviors by using a process-tracing technique that...
Do people consider alternative uses of money (i.e. opportunity cost) when asked to donate to a charitable cause? To answer this question, we examined the effect of providing versus not providing participants with an opportunity cost reminder when they are asked to donate money to causes with identified and non-identified victims. The results of two studies show that when making one-time donation decisions, people become less willing to donate to charity when reminded of opportunity cost, but mai...
#1Mathieu Lefebvre (UDS: University of Strasbourg)H-Index: 9
#2Anne Stenger (UDS: University of Strasbourg)H-Index: 12
Using a common experimental framework, this paper addresses both the question of the short-term and the long-lasting effects of temporary monetary and non-monetary incentive mechanisms on increasing individual contributions to the public good. The results show that both punishments and rewards significantly increase contributions compared to the baseline, but that monetary sanctions lead to the highest contributions, whereas non-monetary sanctions lead to the lowest contributions. The four types...
Collective marketing campaigns may feature goals that are not shared equally by all customers, such as a fundraiser for an environmental cause. For such campaigns, how can marketers encourage broad participation? The present research demonstrates that the framing of collective progress in such campaigns can broaden participation by highlighting the “large area” of progress toward the goal, emphasizing progress achieved for campaigns in their late stages and progress remaining in their early stag...