Original paper
Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials
Abstract
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) play a central role in modern medical advance, and they require participants who understand and accept the procedures involved. Published evidence suggests that RCT participants often fail to understand that treatments are allocated at random and that clinicians are in equipoise about which treatment is best. We examine background assumptions that members of the public might draw upon if invited to take part...
Paper Details
Title
Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials
Published Date
Feb 1, 2004
Journal
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
811 - 824
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History