Between the Covers: International Relations in Books

Published on Jan 1, 2013in PS Political Science & Politics1.342
· DOI :10.1017/S1049096512001291
Jason Campbell Sharman18
Estimated H-index: 18
(Griffith University),
Catherine Weaver7
Estimated H-index: 7
(University of Texas at Austin)
Efforts to systematize our knowledge of international relations (IR) have tended to focus on journal articles while ignoring books. In contrast, we argue that to know IR we must know IR books. To this end, this article presents the first systematic analysis of such books based on coding 500 IR texts published by leading presses against variables covering methodology, theoretical paradigm, and policy application. We compare the results with those of the Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) project's coding of 2,800 journal articles against the same variables, and the 2008 and 2011 TRIP surveys of more than 3,000 IR scholars. The main findings are that books are much less quantitative than articles published in leading journals, are somewhat more representative of the field according to paradigm, and are more engaged with policy concerns.
  • References (10)
  • Citations (6)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
73 Citations
1 Citations
24 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
It is always risky to pronounce a verdict of death on ideas, even after an extended period of apparent lifelessness, but I predict that we have seen the last of the "sociologists" in political science. . . . What has happened is that others too have penetrated the characteristically sloppy logic and flabby prose to discover the deeper problems of circularity and vacuousness inherent in the approach.
396 Citations
#1Daniel Maliniak (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 9
#2Amy Oakes (W&M: College of William & Mary)H-Index: 5
Last. Michael J. Tierney (W&M: College of William & Mary)H-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
73 CitationsSource
#1James C. Garand (LSU: Louisiana State University)H-Index: 26
#2Micheal W. Giles (Emory University)H-Index: 17
Previous research has documented how political scientists evaluate and rank scholarly journals, but the evaluation and ranking of scholarly book publishers has drawn less attention. In this article, we use data from a survey of 603 American political scientists to generate a ranking of scholarly publishers in political science. We used open-ended questions to ask respondents to identify those scholarly publishers (1) to which they would submit “a very strong book manuscript” in their area of exp...
15 CitationsSource
#1Benjamin J. CohenH-Index: 26
List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Introduction 1 CHAPTER ONE: The American School 16 CHAPTER TWO: The British School 44 CHAPTER THREE: A Really Big Question 66 CHAPTER FOUR: The Control Gap 95 CHAPTER FIVE: The Mystery of the State 118 CHAPTER SIX: What Have We Learned? 142 CHAPTER SEVEN: New Bridges? 169 References 179 Index 199
143 Citations
ABSTRACT In a recent article in RIPE, Benjamin J. Cohen suggests that a deep divide exists between two schools of IPE: the American and the British. While, at a certain level of generality, obvious differences do exist between how international relations generally, and IPE more specifically, are studied in the US and the UK, various dimensions of Cohen's argument are problematic, and may inadvertently hinder his professed desire to build bridges across the Atlantic. In particular, Cohen's approa...
33 CitationsSource
By examining citations in international relations journal articles published between 2000 and 2005, this study reveals that international relations scholars more heavily rely on books rather than on journals. Less than 2% of the citations are from electronic resources. Materials in foreign languages are utilized insignificantly, with English language citations dominating the research literature. The analysis of subject scatter details the main disciplines that are associated with international r...
21 CitationsSource
#1Larry P. Goodson (The: American University in Cairo)H-Index: 8
#2Bradford Dillman (Koç University)H-Index: 7
Last. Anil Hira (Tulane University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Numerous studies in political science have rated and evaluated various elements of importance to the discipline, including graduate programs, journal quality, and even the contribution of individuals within the discipline itself. We could not discover, however, any study evaluating the quality of academic book publishers in political science. Yet, as we have witnessed in tenure and promotion cases, in hiring decisions, in departmental gossip, and at APSA meetings and other professional gathering...
29 CitationsSource
The international relations (IR) discipline is dominated by the American research community. Data about publication patterns in leading journals document this situation as well as a variance in theoretical orientations. IR is conducted differently in different places. The main patterns are explained through a sociology of science model that emphasizes the different nineteenth-century histories of the state, the early format of social science, and the institutionalized delineation among the diffe...
328 CitationsSource
#1Kenneth N. WaltzH-Index: 27
5,566 Citations
Cited By6
9 CitationsSource
#1Jacek Czaputowicz (University of Warsaw)H-Index: 3
#2Anna Wojciuk (University of Warsaw)H-Index: 3
This chapter systematically analyzes publications and Ph.D. dissertations with regard to their content, topics, methodology, theoretical approaches, author’s gender, and geographical region of focus. It consists of a quantitative part (analysis of 935 articles published in top academic journals between 2007 and 2012, and 339 doctoral dissertations defended between 2001 and 2012) and a qualitative part (where all the texts which were identified as containing theoretical and methodological referen...
#1Jacek Czaputowicz (University of Warsaw)H-Index: 3
#2Anna Wojciuk (University of Warsaw)H-Index: 3
This chapter presents International Relations as a scholarly discipline and its developmental models in different states. It analyzes the historical development of the field, institutional setups, disciplinary power, as well as the theoretical and methodological preferences in the discipline in the USA, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Germany and Nordic states. It identifies distinctive IR models in continental Europe, i.e., “self-reliant,” “resigned marginalization,” and “multi-level ...
#1Jason Campbell Sharman (Griffith University)H-Index: 18
#2Catherine Weaver (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 7
On the occasion of the Review of International Political Economy 's 20th anniversary, this paper systematically assesses RIPE 's claim to represent an alternative to the 'mainstream' study of international political economy (IPE) with several new sources of evidence. The first is the IPE component of a 20-country survey of international relations (IR) faculty, the second a database of books in the field. The third, and most important, is derived from coding 326 RIPE articles published 2000-10 to...
5 CitationsSource
This article analyses the results of the most recent and largest cross-national survey on the international relations discipline. Completed by scholars in 20 countries, the survey covered the areas of teaching, research, foreign policy, the profession, and the relationship between policy and academia. From an Australian perspective, the key findings include the strong link between what academics teach and research; the narrowing epistemological gap between the USA and Australia; the curious pess...
5 CitationsSource
Transatlantic international relations (IR) theory has more or less neglected the international relations of East Asia. This relative neglect has come in different forms: excluding East Asian cases from analysis, including East Asian cases but miscoding or misunderstanding them, or including them but missing the fact that they do not confirm the main findings of the study. A review of the East Asia–related literature on three important clusters of theorizing—structural theories of conflict, insti...
52 CitationsSource