Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

Claudia Valli; Victoria Howatt; Anna Prokop-Dorner; Montserrat Rabassa; Bradley C. Johnston; Joanna Zajac; Mi Ah Han; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Gordon H. Guyatt; Malgorzata M Bala; Pablo Alonso-Coello

doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2

Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

,

,

..., Pablo Alonso-Coello

67

F1000Research

Volume: 9, Pages: 346 - 346

Published: May 13, 2021

Abstract

Background: People need to choose from a wide range of foods, and in addition to availability and accessibility, people’s values and preferences largely determine their daily food choices. Given the potential adverse health consequences of red and processed meat and the limited knowledge on individuals’ health-related values and preferences on the topic, such data would be useful in the development of recommendations...

Paper Fields

Paper Details

Title

Evaluating adults’ health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

DOI

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23593.2

Published Date

May 13, 2021

Journal

F1000Research

Volume

9

Pages

346 - 346

Citation AnalysisPro

You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro

Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?

Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.

Learn more

Notes

History