Administrative discretion in scientific funding: Evidence from a prestigious postdoctoral training program✰
Abstract
The scientific community is engaged in an active debate on the value of its peer-review system. Does peer review actually serve the role we envision for it—that of helping government agencies predict what ideas have the best chance of contributing to scientific advancement? Many federal agencies use a two-step review process that includes programmatic discretion in selecting awards. This process allows us to determine whether success in a future...
Paper Details
Title
Administrative discretion in scientific funding: Evidence from a prestigious postdoctoral training program✰
Published Date
May 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
103953 - 103953
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History