How robust is our cumulative knowledge on turnover?

Volume: 36, Issue: 3, Pages: 349 - 365
Published: Feb 28, 2020
Abstract
Although systematic reviews are considered the primary means for generating cumulative knowledge and their results are often used to inform evidence-based practice, the robustness of their meta-analytic summary estimates is rarely investigated. Consequently, the results of published systematic reviews and, by extension, our cumulative knowledge have come under scrutiny. Using a comprehensive approach to sensitivity analysis, we examined the...
Paper Details
Title
How robust is our cumulative knowledge on turnover?
Published Date
Feb 28, 2020
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
349 - 365
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.