Encoding of deterministic and stochastic auditory rules in the human brain: The mismatch negativity mechanism does not reflect basic probability.

Published on Feb 7, 2020in Hearing Research2.952
· DOI :10.1016/J.HEARES.2020.107907
Erich Schröger63
Estimated H-index: 63
Urte Roeber15
Estimated H-index: 15
Abstract Regularities in a sequence of sounds can be automatically encoded in a predictive model by the auditory system. When a sound deviates from the one predicted by the model, a mismatch negativity (MMN) is elicited, which is taken to reflect a prediction error at a particular level of the model hierarchy. Although there are many studies on deterministic regularities, only a few have investigated the brain's ability to encode non-deterministic regularities. We studied a simple stochastic regularity: two tone pitches (standards, each occurring on 45% of trials); this regularity was occasionally violated by another tone pitch (deviant, occurring on 10% of trials). We found MMN when the deviant's pitch was outside those of the standards, but not when it was between them. Importantly, when we alternated the occurrence of the same two standards, making them deterministic, the deviant elicited MMN, even when its pitch was between those of the standards. Thus, although the MMN system is extremely powerful in establishing even quite complex deterministic regularities, it fails with a simple stochastic regularity. We argue that the MMN system does not know basic probability.
  • References (49)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
12 Citations
6 Citations
7 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Massimo Lumaca (Royal Academy of Music)H-Index: 3
#2Niels Trusbak Haumann (Royal Academy of Music)H-Index: 3
Last. Peter Vuust (Royal Academy of Music)H-Index: 25
view all 5 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Maxime Maheu (Paris V: Paris Descartes University)H-Index: 3
#2Stanislas Dehaene (Collège de France)H-Index: 127
Last. Meyniel Florent (Université Paris-Saclay)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Benjamin Skerritt-Davis (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 1
#2Mounya Elhilali (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 23
Our ability to parse our acoustic environment relies on the brain’s capacity to extract statistical regularities from surrounding sounds. Previous work in regularity extraction has predominantly focused on the brain’s sensitivity to predictable patterns in sound sequences. However, natural sound environments are rarely completely predictable, often containing some level of randomness, yet the brain is able to effectively interpret its surroundings by extracting useful information from stochastic...
4 CitationsSource
#1Meyniel Florent (Université Paris-Saclay)H-Index: 8
#2Maxime Maheu (Paris V: Paris Descartes University)H-Index: 3
Last. Stanislas Dehaene (Collège de France)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
The brain constantly infers the causes of the inputs it receives and uses these inferences to generate statistical expectations about future observations. Experimental evidence for these expectations and their violations include explicit reports, sequential effects on reaction times, and mismatch or surprise signals recorded in electrophysiology and functional MRI. Here, we explore the hypothesis that the brain acts as a near-optimal inference device that constantly attempts to infer the time-va...
22 CitationsSource
#1Maria Mittag (UH: University of Helsinki)H-Index: 5
#2Rika Takegata (UH: University of Helsinki)H-Index: 15
Last. István Winkler (MTA: Hungarian Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 58
view all 3 authors...
Representations encoding the probabilities of auditory events do not directly support predictive processing. In contrast, information about the probability with which a given sound follows another (transitional probability) allows predictions of upcoming sounds. We tested whether behavioral and cortical auditory deviance detection (the latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on probabilities of sound patterns or on transitional probabilities. We presented health...
12 CitationsSource
#1Marta I. Garrido (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 22
#2Chee Leong James Teng (NUS: National University of Singapore)H-Index: 1
Last. Jason B. Mattingley (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 61
view all 5 authors...
The ability to learn about regularities in the environment and to make predictions about future events is fundamental for adaptive behaviour. We have previously shown that people can implicitly encode statistical regularities and detect violations therein, as reflected in neuronal responses to unpredictable events that carry a unique prediction error signature. In the real world, however, learning about regularities will often occur in the context of competing cognitive demands. Here we asked wh...
8 CitationsSource
#1Nicolas Barascud (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 7
#2Marcus T. Pearce (QMUL: Queen Mary University of London)H-Index: 26
Last. Maria Chait (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 19
view all 5 authors...
Abstract We use behavioral methods, magnetoencephalography, and functional MRI to investigate how human listeners discover temporal patterns and statistical regularities in complex sound sequences. Sensitivity to patterns is fundamental to sensory processing, in particular in the auditory system, because most auditory signals only have meaning as successions over time. Previous evidence suggests that the brain is tuned to the statistics of sensory stimulation. However, the process through which ...
66 CitationsSource
#1István Winkler (MTA: Hungarian Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 58
#2Erich Schröger (Leipzig University)H-Index: 63
Communication by sounds requires that the communication channels (i.e. speech/speakers and other sound sources) had been established. This allows to separate concurrently active sound sources, to track their identity, to assess the type of message arriving from them, and to decide whether and when to react (e.g., reply to the message). We propose that these functions rely on a common generative model of the auditory environment. This model predicts upcoming sounds on the basis of representations...
25 CitationsSource
#1Elyse S. Sussman (Albert Einstein College of Medicine)H-Index: 36
#2S. Chen (Albert Einstein College of Medicine)H-Index: 1
Last. Elizabeth A. Dinces (Albert Einstein College of Medicine)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
The goal of this review article is to redefine what the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of event-related potentials reflects in auditory scene analysis, and to provide an overview of how the MMN serves as a valuable tool in Cognitive Neuroscience research. In doing so, some of the old beliefs (five common ‘myths’) about MMN will be dispelled, such as the notion that MMN is a simple feature discriminator and that attention itself modulates MMN elicitation. A revised description of what MMN tr...
49 CitationsSource
#1Yonatan I. Fishman (Albert Einstein College of Medicine)H-Index: 19
The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a pre-attentive auditory event-related potential (ERP) component that is elicited by a change in a repetitive acoustic pattern. It is obtained by subtracting responses evoked by frequent ‘standard’ sounds from responses evoked by infrequent ‘deviant’ sounds that differ from the standards along some acoustic dimension, e.g., frequency, intensity, or duration, or abstract feature. The MMN has been attributed to neural generators within the temporal and frontal lobe...
50 CitationsSource
Cited By0