Original paper
Expert–Novice Comparison Reveals Pedagogical Implications for Students’ Analysis of Primary Literature
Abstract
Student engagement in the analysis of primary scientific literature increases critical thinking, scientific literacy, data evaluation, and science process skills. However, little is known about the process by which expertise in reading scientific articles develops. For this reason, we decided to compare how faculty experts and student novices engage with a research article. We performed think-aloud interviews of biology faculty and...
Paper Details
Title
Expert–Novice Comparison Reveals Pedagogical Implications for Students’ Analysis of Primary Literature
Published Date
Dec 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
ar56 - ar56
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History