Review paper
Surgical versus conservative management of ankle fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
This study compared outcomes of surgical versus conservative management of ankle fractures in adults through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases (1946–June 2019) for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing surgical versus conservative management of closed adult ankle fractures of any type. Estimates of effect were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. 1153...
Paper Details
Title
Surgical versus conservative management of ankle fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published Date
Oct 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
723 - 735
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History