Original paper
Assessing the efficacy and experience of in-person versus telephonic psychiatric evaluations for asylum seekers in the U.S.
Abstract
Psychiatric evaluations of asylum seekers in the U.S. play an important role in asylum cases; however, there are significant barriers to assessing asylum seekers' psychological trauma. Telephonic psychiatric evaluations provide an opportunity to access important resources to bolster their case. In this retrospective study, we considered the efficacy of telephonic psychiatric evaluations and assessed their potential as a solution to meet the...
Paper Details
Title
Assessing the efficacy and experience of in-person versus telephonic psychiatric evaluations for asylum seekers in the U.S.
Published Date
Dec 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
282
Pages
112612 - 112612
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History