Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around The Globe

Published on Sep 15, 2019in International journal of health policy and management
路 DOI :10.15171/ijhpm.2019.72
Wija Oortwijn11
Estimated H-index: 11
Maarten Jansen5
Estimated H-index: 5
Rob Baltussen40
Estimated H-index: 40
Background Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guide health technology assessment (HTA) agencies to improve their processes towards more legitimate decision-making. The EDP framework provides guidance that covers the HTA process, ie, contextual factors, installation of an appraisal committee, selecting health technologies and criteria, assessment, appraisal, and communication and appeal. The aims of this study were to identify the level of use of EDPs by HTA agencies, identify their needs for guidance, and to learn about best practices. Methods A questionnaire for an online survey was developed based on the EDP framework, consisting of elements that reflect each part of the framework. The survey was sent to members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA). Two weeks following the invitation, a reminder was sent. The data collection took place between September-December 2018. Results Contact persons from 27 member agencies filled out the survey (response rate: 54%), of which 25 completed all questions. We found that contextual factors to support HTA development and the critical elements regarding conducting and reporting on HTA are overall in place. Respondents indicated that guidance was needed for specific elements related to selecting technologies and criteria, appraisal, and communication and appeal. With regard to best practices, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, UK) were most often mentioned. Conclusion This is the first survey among HTA agencies regarding the use of EDPs and provides useful information for further developing a practical guide for HTA agencies around the globe. The results could support HTA agencies in improving their processes towards more legitimate decision-making, as they could serve as a baseline measurement for future monitoring and evaluation.
  • References (15)
  • Citations (0)
馃摉 Papers frequently viewed together
4 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 40
#2Kevin MarshH-Index: 7
Last. Henk Broekhuizen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 2
view all 23 authors...
Abstract Objective Recent years have witnessed an increased interest in the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for setting healthcare priorities. However, its implementation to date has been criticized for being 鈥渆ntirely mechanistic,鈥 ignoring opportunity costs, and not following best practice guidelines. This article provides guidance on the use of MCDA in this context. Methods The present study was based on a systematic review ...
#1Finn B酶rlum Kristensen (University of Southern Denmark)H-Index: 12
#2Don Husereau (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 20
Last. Allan Wailoo (University of Sheffield)H-Index: 30
view all 17 authors...
5 CitationsSource
1 CitationsSource
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify good practice principles for health technology assessment (HTA) that are the most relevant and of highest priority for application in Latin America and to identify potential barriers to their implementation in the region. Methods: HTA good practice principles proposed at the international level were identified and then explored during a deliberative process in a forum of assessors, funders, and product manufacturers. Results: Forty-two representa...
3 CitationsSource
Objectives: Latin American countries are taking important steps to expand and strengthen universal health coverage, and health technology assessment (HTA) has an increasingly prominent role in this process. Participation of all relevant stakeholders has become a priority in this effort. Key issues in this area were discussed during the 2017 Latin American Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Policy Forum. Methods: The Forum included forty-one participants from Latin American HTA age...
2 CitationsSource
#1Wija Oortwijn (Ecorys)H-Index: 11
#2Domino Determann (Ecorys)H-Index: 1
Last. Jeroen van der Tuin (Ecorys)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Objectives To assess the level of comprehensiveness of health technology assessment (HTA) practices around the globe and to formulate recommendations for enhancing legitimacy and fairness of related decision-making processes. Methods To identify best practices, we developed an evaluation framework consisting of 13 criteria on the basis of the INTEGRATE-HTA model (integrative perspective on assessing health technologies) and the Accountability for Reasonableness framework (deliberative a...
8 CitationsSource
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (UHC), as long as it is context-specific and considered within deliberative processes at the country level. Institutionalising robust deliberative processes requires significant time and resources, however, and countries often begin by demanding evidence (including local CEA evidence as well as evidence about local values), whilst striving to strengthen the governance structures and technical capaci...
8 CitationsSource
Governments in low- and middle-income countries are legitimizing the implementation of universal health coverage (UHC), following a United Nation鈥檚 resolution on UHC in 2012 and its reinforcement in the sustainable development goals set in 2015. UHC will differ in each country depending on country contexts and needs, as well as demand and supply in health care. Therefore, fundamental issues such as objectives, users and cost鈥揺ffectiveness of UHC have been raised by policy-makers and stakeholders...
31 CitationsSource
#1Amanda Glassman (CGD: Center for Global Development)H-Index: 19
#2Ursula Giedion (BID: Inter-American Development Bank)H-Index: 11
Last. Peter C. Smith (Imperial College London)H-Index: 58
view all 4 authors...
Abstract鈥擳here is immense interest worldwide in the notion of universal health coverage (UHC). A major policy focus in moving toward UHC has been on the key policy question: what services should be made available and under what conditions? In this article we are concerned with how a feasible set of UHC services can be explicitly defined to create what is commonly known as a 鈥渉ealth benefits package鈥 (HBP), a set of services that can be feasibly financed and provided under the actual circumstance...
20 CitationsSource
Cited By0