Match!
Rob Baltussen
Radboud University Nijmegen
158Publications
40H-index
6,191Citations
Publications 160
Newest
#1Vivian Reckers-Droog (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 1
#2Maarten JansenH-Index: 5
Last.Job van Exel (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 28
view all 6 authors...
Abstract A deliberative citizens panel was held to obtain insight into criteria considered relevant for healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands. Our aim was to examine whether and how panel participation influenced participants’ views on this topic. Participants (n = 24) deliberated on eight reimbursement cases in September/October, 2017. Using Q methodology, we identified three distinct viewpoints before (T0) and after (T1) panel participation. At T0, viewpoint 1 emphasised that access t...
1 CitationsSource
Source
#1Leon Bijlmakers (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 8
#2Maarten Jansen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 5
Last.Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 40
view all 9 authors...
Abstract Background Some studies in the Netherlands have gauged public views on principles for health care priority setting, but they fall short of comprehensively explaining the public disapproval of several recent reimbursement decisions. Objective To obtain insight into citizens’ preferences and identify the criteria they would propose for decisions pertaining to the benefits package of basic health insurance. Methods Twenty-four Dutch citizens were selected for participation in a Citizen For...
2 CitationsSource
#1Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 40
#2Kevin MarshH-Index: 7
Last.Henk Broekhuizen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 2
view all 23 authors...
Abstract Objective Recent years have witnessed an increased interest in the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for setting healthcare priorities. However, its implementation to date has been criticized for being “entirely mechanistic,” ignoring opportunity costs, and not following best practice guidelines. This article provides guidance on the use of MCDA in this context. Methods The present study was based on a systematic review ...
Source
Background Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guide health technology assessment (HTA) agencies to improve their processes towards more legitimate decision-making. The EDP framework provides guidance that covers the HTA process, ie, contextual factors, installation of an appraisal committee, selecting health technologies and criteria, assessment, appraisal, and communication and appeal. The aims of this study were to identify the level of use of EDPs by H...
Source
Source
#1Maarten Jansen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 5
#2Leon Bijlmakers (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 8
Last.Henk Broekhuizen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
Source
#1Eva Rehfuess (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 29
#2Jan M. Stratil (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 4
Last.Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 40
view all 6 authors...
Introduction Evidence-to-decision (EtD) frameworks intend to ensure that all criteria of relevance to a health decision are systematically considered. This paper, part of a series commissioned by the WHO, reports on the development of an EtD framework that is rooted in WHO norms and values, reflective of the changing global health landscape, and suitable for a range of interventions and complexity features. We also sought to assess the value of this framework to decision-makers at global and nat...
11 CitationsSource
Source
1 CitationsSource
12345678910