Representative Democracy as Defensible Epistocracy

Volume: 114, Issue: 1, Pages: 1 - 13
Published: Sep 9, 2019
Abstract
Epistocratic arrangements are widely rejected because there will be reasonable disagreement about which citizens count as epistemically superior and an epistemically superior subset of citizens may be biased in ways that undermine their ability to generate superior political outcomes. The upshot is supposed to be that systems of democratic government are preferable because they refuse to allow some citizens to rule over others. We show that this...
Paper Details
Title
Representative Democracy as Defensible Epistocracy
Published Date
Sep 9, 2019
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
1 - 13
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.