Match!

The effect of food price changes on consumer purchases: a randomised experiment

Published on Aug 1, 2019in The Lancet. Public health
· DOI :10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30105-7
Wilma E Waterlander10
Estimated H-index: 10
(UvA: University of Amsterdam),
Yannan Jiang26
Estimated H-index: 26
(NIH: National Institutes of Health)
+ 7 AuthorsTony Blakely50
Estimated H-index: 50
(University of Otago)
Abstract
Summary Background Most evidence on health-related food taxes and subsidies relies on observational data and effects on single nutrients or foods instead of total diet. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of randomly assigned food price variations on consumer purchasing, where sets of prices emulated commonly discussed food tax and subsidy policies, including a subsidy on fruit and vegetables, a sweetened beverage tax, and taxes on foods according to sugar, sodium, and saturated fat content. Methods In this study, adult participants (≥18 years) in New Zealand completed up to five weekly shops in a virtual supermarket. Each shopping occasion was randomly allocated to control (no change in prices) or one or more pricing options simulating the following: a fruit and vegetable subsidy (20%), a sweetened beverage tax (20% or 40%), a saturated fat tax (NZ2 per 100 g or per 100 g saturated fat), a salt tax (0·02 per 100 mg or ·04 per 100 mg sodium), or sugar tax (0·40 per 100 g or ·80 per 100 g sugar). The primary outcome was the healthiness of the total shopping basket for each weekly shop (% of total unit food items defined as healthy). Low and high price change options were combined in analyses (eg, results for a saturated fat tax are an average of 2 per 100 g or per 100 g). Findings Between Feb 1, and Dec 1, 2016, we randomly assigned 1132 shoppers, of whom 1038 (91·7%) completed at least one shop and 743 (71·6%) completed all five shops. Overall, data from 4258 shops were included in the analysis, including 645 control shops, 2545 shops where one policy was activated, and 1068 shops with two (or more) policies activated. In the control condition, 67·90% (SD 13·01) of food purchases were classified as healthy. Three of the five policies increased this proportion by a small, but significant amount (saturated fat tax mean absolute difference 1·77%, 95% CI 1·03 to 2·52, p Interpretation Price changes representing saturated fat, sugar, and salt taxes increased total healthy food purchases. As we observed important substitution effects, a combination of different tax and subsidy policies might be the most effective way to improve diets and decrease diet-related chronic diseases. Funding Health Research Council of New Zealand.
  • References (36)
  • Citations (2)
References36
Newest
#1Francisco Goiana-da-Silva (Imperial College London)H-Index: 2
#2David Cruz-e-Silva (IST: Instituto Superior Técnico)H-Index: 1
Last.Fernando AraújoH-Index: 11
view all 6 authors...
#1Dusan Petrovic (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 4
#2Carlos de Mestral (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 4
Last.Silvia Stringhini (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 21
view all 8 authors...
#1Alexandra Wright (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 4
#2Katherine E. Smith (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 23
Last.Mark Hellowell (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
#1Kathryn Backholer (Deakin University)H-Index: 22
#2Miranda R. Blake (Deakin University)H-Index: 8
Last.Stefanie Vandevijvere (University of Auckland)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
View next paperEffects of a price increase on purchases of sugar sweetened beverages. Results from a randomized controlled trial