The IB/ IHRM interface: Exploring the potential of intersectional theorizing

Published on Nov 1, 2019in Journal of World Business5.79
· DOI :10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998
Ulf Andersson (MDH: Mälardalen University College), Chris Brewster52
Estimated H-index: 52
(MDH: Mälardalen University College)
+ 2 AuthorsGeoffrey Wood27
Estimated H-index: 27
(MDH: Mälardalen University College)
Abstract Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.
  • References (82)
  • Citations (0)
#1Ram Mudambi (TU: Temple University)H-Index: 42
#2Rajneesh Narula (University of Reading)H-Index: 37
Last.Grazia D. Santangelo (University of Catania)H-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
#1Geoffrey Wood (University of Essex)H-Index: 27
#2Mike Wright (EPFL: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
Cited By0
View next paperTheorizing with managers: how to achieve both academic rigor and practical relevance?