Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry
Abstract
Researchers misunderstand their role in creating ethical problems when they allow dogmas to purportedly divorce scientists and scientific practices from the values that they embody. Cortina (J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8 , 2019), Edwards (J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6 , 2019), and Powell (J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04196-7 , 2019) help us clarify and further develop our...
Paper Details
Title
Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry
Published Date
May 29, 2019
Journal
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
49 - 62
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History