Impact of Contextual Factors on External Load During a Congested-Fixture Tournament in Elite U’18 Basketball Players

Published on May 15, 2019in Frontiers in Psychology2.13
· DOI :10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01100
José Pino-Ortega5
Estimated H-index: 5
Daniel Rojas-Valverde + 5 AuthorsJorge Lorenzo14
Estimated H-index: 14
An understanding of basketball physical demands during official matches is fundamental for designing specific training, tactical and strategic plans as well as recovery methods during congested fixture periods. Such assessments can be performed using wearable indoor time motion tracking systems. The purpose of this study was to analyze the time-motion profile of under 18-years of age (U’18) basketball players and compare their physical demands in relation to team ranking, playing position, match periods and consecutive matches during a seven-day tournament. Relative Distance (RD), percentage of High-Intensity Running (%HIR), Player Load (PL), Acceleration (Acc), Deceleration (Dec), Peak Speed (PSpeed) and Peak Acceleration (PAcc) were recorded from 94 players (13 centers, 47 forwards and 34 guards) belonging to eight elite teams (age: 17.6±0.8 years; height: 1.91±0.08 m; body mass: 82.5±8.8 kg). WIMU PROTM inertial measurement units with ultra-wide band (UWB) indoor-tracking technology recorded 13 matches during the Adidas Next Generation Tournament Finals in the 2016-2017 season. Paired t-tests and one-way analyses of variance with omega partial squared (ωp²) and Cohen's effect sizes (d) were used to analyze for differences between variables According to team quality, the best teams had lower RD (p= .04; d= -0.14). Guards presented higher RD (p< .01; ωp²= 0.03), PSpeed (p< .01; ωp²= 0.01) and PAcc (p< .01; ωp²= 0.02) compared to forwards and centers. The first quarter showed differences with higher RD (p< .01; ωp²= 0.03), %HIR (p< .01; ωp²= 0.02), and PL (p< .01; ωp²= 0.04) compared to all other quarters. The third match of the tournament presented higher demands in RD (p< .01; ωp²= 0.03), HIR (p< .01; ωp²= 0.01) and PL (p< .01; ωp²= 0.02) compared with the first two matches. This study showed that team quality, playing position, match period and consecutive matches throughout an U'18 basketball tournament influenced the kinematic demands experienced by players during official competition. Therefore, each of these contextual factors should be considered in managing the load and developing individualized strategies for players in tournament settings.
Figures & Tables
  • References (50)
  • Citations (0)
#1Carlos David Gómez-Carmona (University of Murcia)H-Index: 1
#2Alejandro Bastida-Castillo (University of Murcia)H-Index: 2
Last.José Pino-Ortega (University of Murcia)H-Index: 5
view all 5 authors...
#1María Reina Román (University of Extremadura)H-Index: 1
#2Javier GarCía (University of Extremadura)H-Index: 5
Last.Jorge Lorenzo (University of Extremadura)H-Index: 14
view all 4 authors...
#1Samuel P. Hills (Leeds Trinity University)H-Index: 1
#2Martin J. Barwood (Leeds Trinity University)H-Index: 14
Last.Mark Russell (Leeds Trinity University)H-Index: 17
view all 7 authors...
Cited By0
View next paperMatch-running performance of young soccer players in different game formats