Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
Abstract
A strong need exists for a validated tool that clearly defines peer review report quality in biomedical research, as it will allow evaluating interventions aimed at improving the peer review process in well-performed trials. We aim to identify and describe existing tools for assessing the quality of peer review reports in biomedical research.We conducted a methodological systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE (via Ovid) and The Cochrane...
Paper Details
Title
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
Published Date
Mar 6, 2019
Volume
19
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History