Pacifying Hunter-Gatherers

Published on Jun 1, 2019in Human Nature
· DOI :10.1007/s12110-019-09340-w
Raymond Hames22
Estimated H-index: 22
(NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
There is a well-entrenched schism on the frequency (how often), intensity (deaths per 100,000/year), and evolutionary significance of warfare among hunter-gatherers compared with large-scale societies. To simplify, Rousseauians argue that warfare among prehistoric and contemporary hunter-gatherers was nearly absent and, if present, was a late cultural invention. In contrast, so-called Hobbesians argue that violence was relatively common but variable among hunter-gatherers. To defend their views, Rousseauians resort to a variety of tactics to diminish the apparent frequency and intensity of hunter-gatherer warfare. These tactics include redefining war, censoring ethnographic accounts of warfare in comparative analyses, misconstruing archaeological evidence, and claiming that outside contact inflates the intensity of warfare among hunter-gatherers. These tactics are subject to critical analysis and are mostly found to be wanting. Furthermore, Hobbesians with empirical data have already established that the frequency and intensity of hunter-gatherer warfare is greater compared with large-scale societies even though horticultural societies engage in warfare more intensively than hunter-gatherers. In the end I argue that although war is a primitive trait we may share with chimpanzees and/or our last common ancestor, the ability of hunter-gatherer bands to live peaceably with their neighbors, even though war may occur, is a derived trait that fundamentally distinguishes us socially and politically from chimpanzee societies. It is a point often lost in these debates.
  • References (80)
  • Citations (2)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
4 Citations
101 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Margaret MeadH-Index: 1
3 CitationsSource
#1Marc Kissel (ASU: Appalachian State University)H-Index: 3
#2Nam C. Kim (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 5
4 CitationsSource
#1Barbara Fruth (LJMU: Liverpool John Moores University)H-Index: 26
#2Gottfried Hohmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 36
Evolutionary models consider hunting and food sharing to be milestones that paved the way from primate to human societies. Because fossil evidence is scarce, hominoid primates serve as referential models to assess our common ancestors’ capacity in terms of communal use of resources, food sharing, and other forms of cooperation. Whereas chimpanzees form male-male bonds exhibiting resource-defense polygyny with intolerance and aggression toward nonresidents, bonobos form male-female and female-fem...
7 CitationsSource
#1Douglas B. BamforthH-Index: 22
1 CitationsSource
#1Michael L. WilsonH-Index: 29
#2Luke GlowackiH-Index: 10
4 CitationsSource
#1Anne C. Pisor (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 6
#2Martin Surbeck (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 14
Primate individuals use a variety of strategies in intergroup encounters, from aggression to tolerance; however, despite the prevalence of tolerance in humans, recent focus on the evolution of intergroup contest has come at the cost of characterizing the role of tolerance in human sociality. Can we use the selection pressures hypothesized to favor tolerance in intergroup encounters in the non-great ape primates to explain the prevalence and plasticity of tolerance in humans and our closest livin...
1 CitationsSource
#1O. Bar-Yosef (Harvard University)H-Index: 1
An overview of the origins of agriculture cases known from Eurasia and Africa, with a brief survey of the Americas, documents only a few “centers” where subsistence based on founder crops and domesticated animals emerged, and where the additional “noncenters” were identified. By examining the evidence of plant exploitation and eventual cultivation practiced by Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene foragers in regions where the information is sufficiently detailed, together with the nature of their...
7 CitationsSource
#1Mark W. Allen (CPP: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona)H-Index: 3
#2Robert L. Bettinger (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 32
Last. Al W. SchwitallaH-Index: 4
view all 5 authors...
Abstract The origin of human violence and warfare is controversial, and some scholars contend that intergroup conflict was rare until the emergence of sedentary foraging and complex sociopolitical organization, whereas others assert that violence was common and of considerable antiquity among small-scale societies. Here we consider two alternative explanations for the evolution of human violence: (i) individuals resort to violence when benefits outweigh potential costs, which is likely in resour...
13 CitationsSource
#1Mark W. AllenH-Index: 1
5 CitationsSource
#1Mark W. AllenH-Index: 3
#2Terry L. JonesH-Index: 26
Part One. A Neglected Anthropology: Hunter-Gatherer Violence and Warfare Chapter 1: Hunter-Gatherer Conflict: The Last Bastion of the Pacified Past? Mark W. Allen and Terry L. Jones Chapter 2: Forager Warfare and Our Evolutionary Past Steven A. LeBlanc Part Two. Violence and Warfare among Mobile Foragers Chapter 3: Violence and Warfare in the European Paleolithic and Mesolithic Elizabeth Hutton Estabrook Chapter 4: Wild-Type Colonizers and High Levels of Violence among Paleoamericans James C. Ch...
28 CitationsSource
Cited By2
#1Kyle Summers (ECU: East Carolina University)H-Index: 32
#2Bernard J. Crespi (SFU: Simon Fraser University)H-Index: 56
Last. Mark V. Flinn (Baylor University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Inter-group competition including warfare is posited to be a key force in human evolution ( Alexander, 1990 ; Choi & Bowles, 2007 ; Wrangham, 1999). Chagnon's research on the Yanomamo is seminal to understanding warfare in the types of societies characteristic of human evolutionary history. Chagnon's empirical analyses of the hypothesis that competition for status or cultural success is linked to reproduction ( Irons, 1979 ) and warfare attracted considerable controversy. Potential caus...
#1Richard J. Chacon (WU: Winthrop University)H-Index: 7
#2Yamilette Chacon (JMU: James Madison University)H-Index: 2
This special issue of Human Nature presents selected works from the 2015 and 2017 “Warfare, Environment, Social Inequality, and Pro-Sociability” (WESIPS) conferences held at the Center for Cross-Cultural Study in Seville, Spain. These investigations explore the manifestations of indigenous warfare and violence from a host of theoretical perspectives. Topics range from the origins of warfare to the psychological repercussions of combat, the relationship between warfare and status, as well as the ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Robert K. Hitchcock (UNM: University of New Mexico)H-Index: 15
There has been a long-standing debate about the roles of San in the militaries of southern Africa and the prevalence of violence among the Ju/'hoansi and other San people. The evolutionary anthropology and social anthropological debates over the contexts in which violence and warfare occurs among hunters and gatherers are considered, as is the “tribal zone theory” of warfare between states and indigenous people. This paper assesses the issues that arise from these discussions, drawing on data fr...
1 CitationsSource