Pacifying Hunter-Gatherers

Published on Jun 1, 2019in Human Nature
· DOI :10.1007/s12110-019-09340-w
Raymond Hames22
Estimated H-index: 22
(NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
There is a well-entrenched schism on the frequency (how often), intensity (deaths per 100,000/year), and evolutionary significance of warfare among hunter-gatherers compared with large-scale societies. To simplify, Rousseauians argue that warfare among prehistoric and contemporary hunter-gatherers was nearly absent and, if present, was a late cultural invention. In contrast, so-called Hobbesians argue that violence was relatively common but variable among hunter-gatherers. To defend their views, Rousseauians resort to a variety of tactics to diminish the apparent frequency and intensity of hunter-gatherer warfare. These tactics include redefining war, censoring ethnographic accounts of warfare in comparative analyses, misconstruing archaeological evidence, and claiming that outside contact inflates the intensity of warfare among hunter-gatherers. These tactics are subject to critical analysis and are mostly found to be wanting. Furthermore, Hobbesians with empirical data have already established that the frequency and intensity of hunter-gatherer warfare is greater compared with large-scale societies even though horticultural societies engage in warfare more intensively than hunter-gatherers. In the end I argue that although war is a primitive trait we may share with chimpanzees and/or our last common ancestor, the ability of hunter-gatherer bands to live peaceably with their neighbors, even though war may occur, is a derived trait that fundamentally distinguishes us socially and politically from chimpanzee societies. It is a point often lost in these debates.
  • References (80)
  • Citations (2)
#1Marc Kissel (ASU: Appalachian State University)H-Index: 3
#2Nam C. Kim (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 5
#1Barbara Fruth (LJMU: Liverpool John Moores University)H-Index: 26
#2Gottfried Hohmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 36
View next paperHunter-Gatherer Studies and the Millennium: A Look Forward (And Back)