Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness.

Volume: 104, Issue: 10, Pages: 1243 - 1265
Published: Oct 1, 2019
Abstract
Several reviews have been critical of the degree to which scales in industrial/organizational psychology and organizational behavior adequately reflect the content of their construct. One potential reason for that circumstance is a tendency for scholars to focus less on content validation than on other validation methods (e.g., establishing reliability, performing convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validation, and examining factor...
Paper Details
Title
Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness.
Published Date
Oct 1, 2019
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
1243 - 1265
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.