Match!
Jason A. Colquitt
University of Georgia
81Publications
42H-index
15.9kCitations
Publications 81
Newest
#1Ryan Outlaw (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 2
#2Ryan Outlaw (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)
Last.Hudson Sessions (UO: University of Oregon)
view all 4 authors...
#1Joel Brockner (Columbia University)H-Index: 54
Last.Ryan M. Vogel (TU: Temple University)H-Index: 5
view all 0 authors...
#1Jason A. Colquitt (Terry College of Business)H-Index: 42
#2Kate P. Zipay (UO: University of Oregon)H-Index: 3
Last.Ryan Outlaw (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 2
view all 4 authors...
Scholars have long acknowledged that perceptions of justice and fairness are “in the eye of the beholder.” Unfortunately, few attempts have been made to identify the substantive constructs that reside within that subjectivity. As a result, it is difficult to know whether low employee-rated fairness reflects managers who are truly violating justice rules, or whether it instead points to employees who are unusually strict in their perceptions. Drawing on fairness heuristic theory and conceptualiza...
#1Jason A. ColquittH-Index: 42
view all 4 authors...
Several reviews have been critical of the content validity of scales used in applied psychology. Hinkin and Tracey’s (1999) technique–where naive raters gauge the degree to which scale items correspond to construct definitions–offers one quantitative approach to assessing content validity when new scales are introduced. Unfortunately, there is no clear standard–no proverbial “.70”–for judging whether definitional correspondence is adequate or inadequate. To create such a standard, we gathered al...
#2Jason A. ColquittH-Index: 42
view all 3 authors...
In the present symposium, we showcase research that is at the interface between justice scholarship and social/cognitive psychology theory, and which advances our understanding of organizational justice by examining justice processes through novel theoretical perspectives. The papers in this symposium ground their predictions in self-regulation theory (Carver & Scheier, 1981), construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2010), regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997), and theories of need fulfillme...
#1Michael D. Baer (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 4
#2Jessica B. Rodell (UGA: University of Georgia)H-Index: 12
Last.Ryan Outlaw (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 2
view all 7 authors...
Many employees feel a general sense of unfairness toward their supervisors. A common reaction to such unfairness is to talk about it with coworkers. The conventional wisdom is that this unfairness ...
#1Jessica B. Rodell (Terry College of Business)H-Index: 12
#2Jason A. Colquitt (Terry College of Business)H-Index: 42
Last.Michael D. Baer (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Our study challenges the consensus that perceptions of overall fairness are driven solely by adherence to justice rules—that “what seems fair” depends solely on “what seems just.” Building on emerging theorizing on incidental affect and fairness appraisals, we argue that charismatic qualities of supervisors can predict employee perceptions of overall fairness, even when controlling for supervisors’ justice rule adherence. We develop theory for how and when charismatic qualities could exert such ...
12345678