HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results?
Abstract
The practice of hypothesizing after results are known (HARKing) has been identified as a potential threat to the credibility of research results. We conducted simulations using input values based on comprehensive meta-analyses and reviews in applied psychology and management (e.g., strategic management studies) to determine the extent to which two forms of HARKing behaviors might plausibly bias study outcomes and to examine the determinants of...
Paper Details
Title
HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results?
Published Date
Dec 11, 2017
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1 - 17
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History