Comparison of Weighting Methods Used During The Construction of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool for Repeated Use In Lower Income Countries

Volume: 20, Issue: 9, Pages: A776 - A776
Published: Oct 1, 2017
Abstract
In multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) practice, the criteria taken into account regularly differ in relevance, therefore it is necessary to assign importance weights to them. The objective of this study was to compare the most common criteria weighting methods in the process of developing MCDA tools for repeated use in lower income countries in terms of level of detailedness, real world feasibility, and ability to fulfill the axioms of...
Paper Details
Title
Comparison of Weighting Methods Used During The Construction of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool for Repeated Use In Lower Income Countries
Published Date
Oct 1, 2017
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
A776 - A776
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.