The Food Warden: An Exploration of Issues in Distributing Responsibilities for Safe-by-Design Synthetic Biology Applications

Published on Dec 1, 2018in Science and Engineering Ethics2.275
· DOI :10.1007/s11948-017-9969-0
Zoë Robaey5
Estimated H-index: 5
(TU Delft: Delft University of Technology),
Shannon Spruit4
Estimated H-index: 4
(TU Delft: Delft University of Technology),
Ibo van de Poel24
Estimated H-index: 24
(TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)
The Safe-by-Design approach in synthetic biology holds the promise of designing the building blocks of life in an organism guided by the value of safety. This paves a new way for using biotechnologies safely. However, the Safe-by-Design approach moves the bulk of the responsibility for safety to the actors in the research and development phase. Also, it assumes that safety can be defined and understood by all stakeholders in the same way. These assumptions are problematic and might actually undermine safety. This research explores these assumptions through the use of a Group Decision Room. In this set up, anonymous and non-anonymous deliberation methods are used for different stakeholders to exchange views. During the session, a potential synthetic biology application is used as a case for investigation: the Food Warden, a biosensor contained in meat packaging for indicating the freshness of meat. Participants discuss what potential issues might arise, how responsibilities should be distributed in a forward-looking way, who is to blame if something would go wrong. They are also asked what safety and responsibility mean at different phases, and for different stakeholders. The results of the session are not generalizable, but provide valuable insights. Issues of safety cannot all be taken care of in the R&D phase. Also, when things go wrong, there are proximal and distal causes to consider. In addition, capacities of actors play an important role in defining their responsibilities. Last but not least, this research provides a new perspective on the role of instruction manuals in achieving safety.
  • References (32)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Author (Ian Sommerville)
15 Citations
1 Author (Linda J. Bellamy)
1 Citations
1 Author (N Muhlrad)
2 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Langdon WinnerH-Index: 16
In controversies about technology and society, there is no idea more pro vocative than the notion that technical things have political qualities. At issue is the claim that the machines, structures, and systems of modern material culture can be accurately judged not only for their contributions of efficiency and pro ductivity, not merely for their positive and negative environmental side effects, but also for the ways in which they can embody specific forms of power and authority. Since ideas of...
865 CitationsSource
#1Neelke Doorn (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 15
#2Shannon Spruit (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 4
Last. Zoë Robaey (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 5
view all 3 authors...
Technology has always been a vital component of human development, most often aimed at the advancement of human well-being. However, the introduction of new technologies may also introduce harmful consequences. Indeed, we often do not know beforehand the full spectrum of potential impacts and hazards that these new technologies may bring about. Conventional approaches to risk governance are not directly applicable to these fields due to high levels of uncertainty and ignorance. The inadequacies ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Zoë Robaey (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 5
Genetically modified organisms are a technology now used with increasing frequency in agriculture. Genetically modified seeds have the special characteristic of being living artefacts that can reproduce and spread; thus it is difficult to control where they end up. In addition, genetically modified seeds may also bring about uncertainties for environmental and human health. Where they will go and what effect they will have is therefore very hard to predict: this creates a puzzle for regulators. ...
10 CitationsSource
#1van de I.R. PoelH-Index: 1
#2Lambèr RoyakkersH-Index: 12
Last. Sjoerd D. ZwartH-Index: 9
view all 3 authors...
When many people are involved in an activity, it is often difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint who is morally responsible for what, a phenomenon known as the 'problem of many hands.' This term is increasingly used to describe problems with attributing individual responsibility in collective settings in such diverse areas as public administration, corporate management, law and regulation, technological development and innovation, healthcare, and finance. This volume provides an in-depth phil...
18 Citations
The adoption of the European Union’s (EU) Cosmetics Regulation–which came into effect as of July 2013–is significant because it was the first piece of legislation at the national or supranational level to include provisions relating specifically to the use of nanomaterials in any products. While the regulation does not change the fundamental aspects of the regulatory regime, which includes putting full responsibility for ensuring the safety of the cosmetic product on the manufacturer/importer, t...
5 CitationsSource
#1Zoë Robaey (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 5
Until now, the debates around genetically modified seeds in agriculture have converged towards two main issues. The first is about hazards that this new technology brings about, and the second is about the ownership of seeds and the distribution of their economic benefits. In this paper, I explore an underdeveloped topic by linking these two issues: how ownership shapes the distribution of moral responsibility for the potential hazards of genetically modified seeds. Indeed, while ownership is de...
5 CitationsSource
#1Ibo van de Poel (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 24
#2Peter Kroes (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 21
Under the banner of Value Sensitive Design (VSD) various proposals have been put forward in recent times to integrate moral values in technology through design. These proposals suppose that technology, more in particular technical artifacts, can embody values. In this contribution, we investigate whether this idea holds water. To do so, we examine the neutrality thesis about technology, that is, the thesis that technology is neutral with regard to moral values. This thesis may be interpreted in ...
14 CitationsSource
#1Ibo van de Poel (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 24
10 CitationsSource
#1Ibo van de Poel (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 24
A crucial step in Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is the translation of values into design requirements. However, few research has been done on how this translation can be made. In this contribution, I first consider an example of this translation. I then introduce the notion of values hierarchy, a hierarchy structure of values, norms and design requirements. I discuss the relation of specification, by which values can be translated into design requirements, and the for the sake of relation which c...
76 CitationsSource
The present article explores the rationales of scientists and engineers for distributing moral responsibilities related technology development. On the basis of a qualitative case study, it was investigated how the actors within a research network distribute responsibilities for these issues. Rawls’ Wide Reflective Equilibrium model was used as a descriptive framework. This study indicates that there is a correlation between the actors’ ethics position and their responsibility rationale. When dis...
25 CitationsSource
Cited By0
#1Britte Bouchaut (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)
#2Lotte Asveld (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 5
: Advanced gene editing techniques such as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Cas have increased the pace of developments in the field of industrial biotechnology. Such techniques imply new possibilities when working with living organisms, possibly leading to uncertain risks. In the Netherlands, current policy fails to address these uncertain risks because risk classification is determined process-wise (i.e., genetically modified organism [GMO] and non-GMO), there ...