Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion?

Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 24 - 38
Published: Mar 1, 2016
Abstract
Media critics have expressed concern that journalistic "false balance" can distort the public's perceptions of what ought to be noncontroversial subjects (e.g., climate change). I report several experiments testing the influence of presenting conflicting comments from 2 experts who disagree on an issue (balance condition) in addition to a complete count of the number of experts on a panel who favor either side. Compared with a control condition,...
Paper Details
Title
Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion?
Published Date
Mar 1, 2016
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
24 - 38
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.