Review paper
Born Large for Gestational Age: Bigger Is Not Always Better
Abstract
During the past 60-90 years, there has been a change in the growth trajectories of large for gestational age (LGA) babies and the associated health effects later in life. Subjects classified as large at birth in the 1920s were found to have reduced morbidity and mortality in their seventh decade compared with those born of lower birth weight.1Hales C.N. Barker D.J. Clark P.M. Cox L.J. Fall C. Osmond C. et al.Fetal and infant growth and impaired...
Paper Details
Title
Born Large for Gestational Age: Bigger Is Not Always Better
Published Date
Mar 1, 2016
Journal
Volume
170
Pages
307 - 311
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History