Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference

Volume: 37, Issue: 1, Pages: 167 - 176
Published: Dec 22, 2015
Abstract
Research summary : This article uses distributional matching and posterior predictive checks to estimate the extent of false and inflated findings in empirical research on strategic management. Based on a sample of 300 papers in top outlets for research on strategic management, we estimate that if each study were repeated, 24–40 percent of significant coefficients would become insignificant at the five percent level. Our best guess is that for...
Paper Details
Title
Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference
Published Date
Dec 22, 2015
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
167 - 176
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.