Match!

Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Published on Jan 1, 2015
· DOI :10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196
Zoë Harcombe7
Estimated H-index: 7
(University of the West of Scotland),
Julien S. Baker21
Estimated H-index: 21
(University of the West of Scotland)
+ 4 AuthorsFergal M. Grace17
Estimated H-index: 17
(University of the West of Scotland)
Abstract
Objectives: National dietary guidelines were introduced in 1977 and 1983, by the US and UK governments, respectively, with the ambition of reducing coronary heart disease (CHD) by reducing fat intake. To date, no analysis of the evidence base for these recommendations has been undertaken. The present study examines the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available to the US and UK regulatory committees at their respective points of implementation. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken of RCTs, published prior to 1983, which examined the relationship between dietary fat, serum cholesterol and the development of CHD. Results: 2467 males participated in six dietary trials: five secondary prevention studies and one including healthy participants. There were 370 deaths from allcause mortality in the intervention and control groups. The risk ratio (RR) from meta-analysis was 0.996 (95% CI 0.865 to 1.147). There were 207 and 216 deaths from CHD in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The RR was 0.989 (95% CI 0.784 to 1.247). There were no differences in all-cause mortality and non-significant differences in CHD mortality, resulting from the dietary interventions. The reductions in mean serum cholesterol levels were significantly higher in the intervention groups; this did not result in significant differences in CHD or all-cause mortality. Government dietary fat recommendations were untested in any trial prior to being introduced. Conclusions: Dietary recommendations were introduced for 220 million US and 56 million UK citizens by 1983, in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs.
Figures & Tables
  • References (28)
  • Citations (75)
References28
Newest
#1Jonathan A C Sterne (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 83
#2Alex J. Sutton (University of Leicester)H-Index: 81
Last.Christian Schmidt (Tufts University)H-Index: 89
view all 19 authors...
#1David Moher (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute)H-Index: 126
#2Alessandro Liberati (University of Birmingham)H-Index: 44
Last.Douglas G. Altman (University of Oxford)H-Index: 208
view all 4 authors...
Cited By75
Newest
#1Irene de Diego (Leibniz Association)
#2Shahaf Peleg (Qingdao University)
Last.Beate Fuchs (Leibniz Association)
view all 3 authors...
#1Phooi Tee Voon (Malaysian Palm Oil Board)H-Index: 1
#2Sin Tien Lee (UPM: Universiti Putra Malaysia)
view all 7 authors...
#1Mohit D. GuptaH-Index: 10
#2M.P. GirishH-Index: 5
Last.Rakesh Yadav (AIIMS: All India Institute of Medical Sciences)H-Index: 12
view all 0 authors...
#1Cliff J. d C. Harvey (AUT: Auckland University of Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Grant Schofield (AUT: Auckland University of Technology)H-Index: 35
Last.Fabrice Merien (AUT: Auckland University of Technology)H-Index: 22
view all 6 authors...
View next paperAssociation of Dietary, Circulating, and Supplement Fatty Acids With Coronary Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis