Review paper
Evaluating research – peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006
Abstract
This paper concerns the relationship between the assessment of the research of individual academics by peer or expert review teams with a variety of bibliometric schemes based on journal quality weights. Specifically, for a common group of economists from New Zealand departments of economics the relationship between Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Research Output measures for those submitting new research portfolios in 2006 are compared...
Paper Details
Title
Evaluating research – peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006
Published Date
Aug 1, 2013
Journal
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
140 - 157
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History