Match!

Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women

Published on Jul 15, 2014in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America9.58
· DOI :10.1073/pnas.1403334111
Jason M. Sheltzer13
Estimated H-index: 13
(MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology),
Joan C. Smith3
Estimated H-index: 3
Sources
Abstract
Women make up over one-half of all doctoral recipients in biology-related fields but are vastly underrepresented at the faculty level in the life sciences. To explore the current causes of women’s underrepresentation in biology, we collected publicly accessible data from university directories and faculty websites about the composition of biology laboratories at leading academic institutions in the United States. We found that male faculty members tended to employ fewer female graduate students and postdoctoral researchers (postdocs) than female faculty members did. Furthermore, elite male faculty—those whose research was funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, who had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences, or who had won a major career award—trained significantly fewer women than other male faculty members. In contrast, elite female faculty did not exhibit a gender bias in employment patterns. New assistant professors at the institutions that we surveyed were largely comprised of postdoctoral researchers from these prominent laboratories, and correspondingly, the laboratories that produced assistant professors had an overabundance of male postdocs. Thus, one cause of the leaky pipeline in biomedical research may be the exclusion of women, or their self-selected absence, from certain high-achieving laboratories.
Figures & Tables
  • References (24)
  • Citations (126)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1,025 Citations
192 Citations
274 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References24
Newest
2 CitationsSource
#1Stephen L. Morgan (Cornell University)H-Index: 23
#2Dafna Gelbgiser (Cornell University)H-Index: 4
Last. Kim A. Weeden (Cornell University)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
In this article, we analyze gender differences in college major selection for respondents to the Education Longitudinal Study (2002–2006), focusing on educational pathways through college that lead to science, engineering, or doctoral-track medicine occupations and to non-doctoral track clinical and health sciences occupations. We show that gender differences in college major selection remain substantial, even for a cohort in which rates of enrollment in postsecondary education are more than ten...
98 CitationsSource
1,025 CitationsSource
#1Philip M. Sadler (Harvard University)H-Index: 26
#2Gerhard Sonnert (Harvard University)H-Index: 21
Last. Robert H. Tai (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 24
view all 4 authors...
This retrospective cohort study characterizes how interest in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) careers changes during high school for more than 6,000 students in a representative national sample of 34 two- and four-year colleges taking mandatory college English courses. Overall, large gender differences in career plans were found, with males showing far more interest particularly in engineering, whereas females were more attracted to careers in health and medicine during thei...
201 CitationsSource
#1Fidan Ana Kurtulus (UMass: University of Massachusetts Amherst)H-Index: 8
#2Donald Tomaskovic-Devey (UMass: University of Massachusetts Amherst)H-Index: 33
The goal of this study is to examine whether women in the highest levels of firms’ management ranks help to reduce barriers to women’s advancement in the workplace. Using a panel of more than twenty thousand firms during 1990 to 2003 from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the authors explore the influence of women in top management on subsequent female representation in lower-level managerial positions in U.S. firms. Key findings show that an increase in the share of female top m...
58 CitationsSource
Premier science largely depends on the quality of the pool of future scientists. Women now represent a large part of the talent pool in the United States, but many data sources indicate that they are more likely than men to “leak” out of the science pipeline before obtaining tenure at a college or university. The authors’ research examines this issue in detail, drawing on multiple sources, including the Survey of Doctorate Recipients and several original surveys. Their findings show that family ...
73 CitationsSource
#1Natalia Zinovyeva (Aalto University)H-Index: 11
#2Manuel F. Bagües (Aalto University)H-Index: 12
Several countries have recently introduced gender quotas in hiring and promotion committees at universities. This paper studies whether these policies increase the presence of women in top academic positions. The identification strategy exploits the random assignment mechanism in place between 2002 and 2006 in all academic disciplines in Spain to select the members of promotion committees. We find that a larger proportion of female evaluators increases the chances of success of female applicants...
46 Citations
431 CitationsSource
#1Stephen J. Ceci (Cornell University)H-Index: 60
#2Wendy M. Williams (Cornell University)H-Index: 27
Despite impressive employment gains in many fields of science, women remain underrepresented in fields requiring intensive use of mathematics. Here we discuss three potential explanations for women’s underrepresentation: (a) male–female mathematical and spatial ability gaps, (b) sex discrimination, and (c) sex differences in career preferences and lifestyle choices. Synthesizing findings from psychology, endocrinology, sociology, economics, and education leads to the conclusion that, among a com...
130 CitationsSource
2 CitationsSource
Cited By126
Newest
#1Klarissa Lueg (University of Southern Denmark)H-Index: 4
Last. Amanda Ni (AU: Aarhus University)
view all 2 authors...
Source
#1Roxanne S. Beltran (UCSC: University of California, Santa Cruz)H-Index: 7
#2Erin Marnocha (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 1
Last. Erika S. Zavaleta (UCSC: University of California, Santa Cruz)H-Index: 37
view all 6 authors...
Source
#1Deborah D. Rupert (SBU: Stony Brook University)H-Index: 1
#1Deborah D. Rupert (CSHL: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)H-Index: 1
Last. Molly Gale Hammell (CSHL: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)H-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
The current academic culture facing women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields in the United States has sparked the formation of grassroots advocacy groups to empower female scientists in training. However, the impact of these initiatives often goes unmeasured and underappreciated. Our Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE) organization serves postdoctoral researchers, graduate students, and research technicians (trainees) at a private research institute for biological sc...
Source
Source
#1Dachin N. Frances (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 3
#2Connor R. Fitzpatrick (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 7
Last. Shannon J. McCauley (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 18
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Laurence Clement (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 1
#1Laurence Clement (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 4
Last. Naledi Marie Saul (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
In addition to developing innovative research programs, life science research faculty at research-intensive institutions are tasked with providing career mentoring and scientific training to new generations of scientists, including postgraduate, graduate, and undergraduate students. In this essay, we argue for a redefinition of mentoring in laboratory research, to thoroughly distinguish three essential roles played by research faculty relative to their trainees: advisor, educator, and supervisor...
1 CitationsSource
#1Denon Start (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 1
#2Shannon J. McCauley (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 18
Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline-specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female...
Source
Source
#1Katherina Kuschel (PUCP: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru)
#1Katherina Kuschel (PUCP: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru)H-Index: 4
Last. Gry Agnete Alsos (Nord University)H-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are notably important for innovation and technological development, which in turn are seen as drivers of social and economic growth. Hence, researchers and policy-makers have paid substantial attention to analyzing and promoting high-growth ventures in STEM fields. However, STEM fields are highly gender-skewed, regardless of whether the population considered is students, faculty members, graduates, top managers, or entrepreneurs. Th...
Source
#1van der Wal (UH: University of Helsinki)
#3Thorogood (University of Cambridge)
Last. Horrocks
view all 3 authors...
Intense competition for limited opportunities means the career path of a scientist is a challenging one, and female scientists in particular are less likely to survive in academia. Collaboration is a key factor in scientific advances, and in social species enhanced sociality improves fitness and longevity. Yet whether sociality influences career progression and survival in science, and how this might differ between genders, is largely unknown. We built authorship social networks from publication...
Source