Common Method Variance and Specification Errors: A Practical Approach to Detection

Volume: 134, Issue: 4, Pages: 401 - 421
Published: Jul 1, 2000
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how examining the bivariate correlations between items in self-report measures can assist in differentiating between possible common method variance vs. model specification errors. Specifically, social desirability was viewed as either a possible source of common method variance or as a theoretically meaningful construct that should be included in the model of interest (i.e., a specification error)....
Paper Details
Title
Common Method Variance and Specification Errors: A Practical Approach to Detection
Published Date
Jul 1, 2000
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
401 - 421
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.