Things you Wanted to Know about Bias in Evaluations but Never Dared to Think

Volume: 45, Issue: 6, Pages: 49 - 64
Published: Nov 1, 2014
Abstract
The thrust for evidence‐based policymaking has paid little attention to problems of bias. Statistical evidence is more fragile than generally understood, and false positives are all too likely given the incentives of policymakers and academic and professional evaluators. Well‐known cognitive biases make bias likely for not dissimilar reasons in qualitative and mixed methods evaluations. What we term delinquent organisational isomorphism promotes...
Paper Details
Title
Things you Wanted to Know about Bias in Evaluations but Never Dared to Think
Published Date
Nov 1, 2014
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
49 - 64
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.