Nurse editors' views on the peer review process

Volume: 28, Issue: 6, Pages: 444 - 452
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Abstract
A growing body of research challenges the inter-rater reliability of peer reviewers and the value of reviewer training or blinding in improving the quality of manuscript reviews, but double-blinded peer review of papers remains a relatively unexamined standard for nursing journals. Using data from a larger emailed survey, the views of 88 nurse editors on peer review were analyzed using content analysis. The majority of nurse editors reported...
Paper Details
Title
Nurse editors' views on the peer review process
Published Date
Jan 1, 2005
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
444 - 452
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.