Match!
Margaret Comerford Freda
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
142Publications
20H-index
1,041Citations
Publications 142
Newest
#1Laura C. LevitonH-Index: 26
#2RobertL. GoldenbergH-Index: 94
Last.James M. RaczynskiH-Index: 36
view all 11 authors...
Source
Source
Last.Karla DamusH-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
4 Citations
Source
#1Molly C. Dougherty (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 24
#2Margaret Comerford Freda (Yeshiva University)H-Index: 20
Last.Marion E. Broome (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 32
view all 5 authors...
Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts’ contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript’s contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of t...
6 CitationsSource
Source
#1Marion E. Broome (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 32
#2Molly C. Dougherty (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 24
Last.Judith Gedney Baggs (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)H-Index: 22
view all 5 authors...
Editors of scientific literature rely heavily on peer reviewers to evaluate the integrity of research conduct and validity of findings in manuscript submissions. The purpose of this study was to describe the ethical concerns of reviewers of nursing journals. This descriptive cross-sectional study was an anonymous online survey. The findings reported here were part of a larger investigation of experiences of reviewers. Fifty-two editors of nursing journals (six outside the USA) agreed to invite t...
13 CitationsSource
Source
Source
12345678910