Empirical evidence for source–sink populations: a review on occurrence, assessments and implications

Published on Aug 1, 2016in Biological Reviews10.29
· DOI :10.1111/brv.12195
Roman D. Furrer2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Swiss Ornithological Institute),
Gilberto Pasinelli21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Swiss Ornithological Institute)
View in Source
Assessing the role of local populations in a landscape context has become increasingly important in the fields of conservation biology and ecology. A growing number of studies attempt to determine the source–sink status of local populations. As the source–sink concept is commonly used for management decisions in nature conservation, accurate assessment approaches are crucial. Based on a systematic literature review of studies published between 2002 and 2013, we evaluated a priori predictions on methodological and biological factors that may influence the occurrence of source or sink populations. The review yielded 90 assessments from 73 publications that included qualitative and quantitative evidence for either source or sink population(s) for one or multiple species. Overall, sink populations tended to occur more often than source populations. Moreover, the occurrence of source or sink populations differed among taxonomic classes. Sinks were more often found than sources in mammals, while there was a non-significant trend for the opposite to be true for amphibians. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the occurrence of sources was positively related to connectivity of local populations. Our review furthermore highlights that more than 25 years after Pulliam's widely cited publication on ‘sources, sinks, and population regulation’, in-depth assessments of the source–sink status of populations based on combined consideration of demographic parameters such as fecundity, survival, emigration and immigration are still scarce. To increase our understanding of source–sink systems from ecological, evolutionary and conservation-related perspectives, we recommend that forthcoming studies on source–sink dynamics should pay more attention to the study design (i.e. connectivity of study populations) and that the assessment of the source–sink status of local populations is based on λ values calculated from demographic rates.
  • References (127)
  • Citations (29)
#1Michael Schaub (Swiss Ornithological Institute)H-Index: 43
#2J. Andrew Royle (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center)H-Index: 60
75 CitationsSource
#1Res Altwegg (UCT: University of Cape Town)H-Index: 31
#2Claire Doutrelant (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 23
Last.Rita Covas (UCT: University of Cape Town)H-Index: 18
view all 5 authors...
15 CitationsSource
#1Michael Schaub (Swiss Ornithological Institute)H-Index: 43
#2Hans JakoberH-Index: 7
Last.Wolfgang StauberH-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
60 CitationsSource
#1Michel Loreau (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 73
#2Tanguy DaufresneH-Index: 15
Last.Nicolas Mouquet (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 46
view all 9 authors...
42 CitationsSource
#1Jesse Newby (UM: University of Montana)H-Index: 3
#2L. Scott Mills (UM: University of Montana)H-Index: 36
Last.Rich DeSimoneH-Index: 2
view all 8 authors...
26 CitationsSource
#1Petter Glorvigen (Hedmark University College)H-Index: 3
#2Harry P. Andreassen (Hedmark University College)H-Index: 29
Last.Rolf A. Ims (University of Tromsø)H-Index: 59
view all 3 authors...
7 CitationsSource
#1David Roshier (Deakin University)H-Index: 20
#2Robert Heinsohn (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 36
Last.Leo Joseph (CSIRO: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)H-Index: 32
view all 5 authors...
10 CitationsSource
#1Katrine Turgeon (McGill University)H-Index: 9
#2Donald L. Kramer (McGill University)H-Index: 49
24 CitationsSource
#1Christian KerbiriouH-Index: 19
#2Isabelle Le ViolH-Index: 15
Last.Alexandre RobertH-Index: 22
view all 4 authors...
4 CitationsSource
#1Byju N. Govindan (Purdue University)H-Index: 5
#2Marc Kéry (Purdue University)H-Index: 1
Last.Robert K. Swihart (Purdue University)H-Index: 43
view all 3 authors...
18 CitationsSource
Cited By29
#1Alexandre Millon (AMU: Aix-Marseille University)H-Index: 14
#2Xavier Lambin (Aberd.: University of Aberdeen)H-Index: 48
Last.Michael Schaub (Swiss Ornithological Institute)H-Index: 43
view all 4 authors...
#1Lina M. Sánchez-Clavijo (UCF: University of Central Florida)H-Index: 2
Last.Pedro F. Quintana (UCF: University of Central Florida)H-Index: 25
view all 3 authors...
#1Rémi Fay (Swiss Ornithological Institute)H-Index: 1
#2Stephanie Michler (Swiss Ornithological Institute)
Last.Michael Schaub (Swiss Ornithological Institute)H-Index: 43
view all 4 authors...
#1Nadège Bélouard (University of Rennes)H-Index: 1
#2Jean-Marc Paillisson (University of Rennes)H-Index: 15
Last.Eric J. Petit (Agrocampus Ouest)H-Index: 29
view all 5 authors...
#1Maud Duranton (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 1
#2François Bonhomme (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 60
Last.Pierre-Alexandre Gagnaire (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Julie A. Heinrichs (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 7
#2Lauren E. Walker (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 2
Last.Amy D. Bleisch (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
#1Steven P. Brady (SCSU: Southern Connecticut State University)H-Index: 8
#2Daniel I. Bolnick (UConn: University of Connecticut)H-Index: 2
Last.Andrew P. Hendry (McGill University)H-Index: 70
view all 18 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Robert N. Rosenfield (UWSP: University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point)H-Index: 19
#2Madeline G. Hardin (UWSP: University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point)H-Index: 3
Last.Paul N. Frater (University of Iceland)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
#1Karen Bisschop (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 1
#2Frederik Mortier (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 3
Last.Dries Bonte (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 35
view all 4 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Douglas A. Kelt (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 28
#2Edward J. Heske (UNM: University of New Mexico)H-Index: 28
Last.Stefan Sommer (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 11
view all 10 authors...
2 CitationsSource