Match!

Peer review and the nursing literature.

Published on Mar 1, 2009in Nursing Research2.02
· DOI :10.1097/NNR.0b013e31819f1589
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
Abstract
  • References (3)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
3 Citations
2018
1 Author (Thomas Gaston)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References3
Newest
#1Susan J. Henly (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 22
#2Molly C. DoughertyH-Index: 24
Dissemination of research findings through publication of results in peer reviewed journals is the gold standard in nursing science. Yet, little is known about quality of manuscript reviews or factors associated with review quality. The purpose of this project was to refine a methodology for assessing quality of reviews and then to evaluate review quality. We created a continuous quality improvement process to assess the narrative portion of 464 reviews of 203 manuscripts submitted to Nursing Re...
20 CitationsSource
#1Margaret H. Kearney (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 26
#2Judith Gedney Baggs (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)H-Index: 22
Last. Margaret Comerford Freda (Yeshiva University)H-Index: 20
view all 5 authors...
Purpose: To describe nursing journal reviewers' professional backgrounds, reviewing experience, time investment, and perceptions of their role. Design: Exploratory descriptive cross-sectional study. Methods: A 69-question survey containing both fixed-option and open-ended questions and accessed via the World Wide Web was completed by 1,675 nursing journal reviewers who had been invited to participate by editors of 52 nursing journals. Findings: Participants were from 44 countries, with 74% from ...
28 CitationsSource
#1Judith Gedney Baggs (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)H-Index: 22
#2Marion E. Broome (IUPUI: Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis)H-Index: 32
Last. Margaret H. Kearney (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 26
view all 5 authors...
Title. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Aim. This paper is a report of a study to assess the beliefs and preferences of reviewers for nursing journals about blinding of authors to reviewers, reviewers to authors, neither or both. Background. Blinding of author and reviewer names in the manuscript review process has been of interest to nursing editors, but reports that are based on data rather than simply opinion concern the editorial practices of biomed...
44 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
#1Susan J. Henly (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 22
#2Jill A. Bennett (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 23
Last. Molly C. Dougherty (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Sound statistical analysis is fundamental to high-quality reporting of quantitative studies. Peer review are also important in determining whether statistical procedures in submitted manuscripts are appropriate and effectively reported. However, the quality of statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to nursing journals has not been previously evaluated. The purpose of this project was to compare the content and quality of statistical and scientific (general) reviews of manuscripts submitted...
4 CitationsSource