Branding/Logomark minus Citation Combined Shape Icon/Bookmark-empty Icon/Copy Icon/Collection Icon/Close Copy 7 no author result Created with Sketch. Icon/Back Created with Sketch.
Loading Scinapse...
Molly C. Dougherty
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
101Publications
24H-index
1,449Citations
Publications 101
Newest
Published on Jun 1, 2011in Journal of Advanced Nursing 2.27
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill),
Shu-Yuan Lin3
Estimated H-index: 3
(Kaohsiung Medical University)
+ 2 AuthorsSinead Keeney22
Estimated H-index: 22
(Ulster University)
The purpose of this study was to examine articles in ISI-ranked nursing journals and to analyse the articles and journals, using definitions of international and article content. Background. Growing emphasis on global health includes attention on international nursing literature. Contributions from Latin America and Africa have been reported. Attention to ranked nursing journals to support scholarship in global health is needed. Method. Using an ex post facto design, characteristics of 2827 arti...
6 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jun 1, 2011in Western Journal of Nursing Research 1.32
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill),
Margaret Comerford Freda20
Estimated H-index: 20
(Yeshiva University)
+ 2 AuthorsMarion E. Broome31
Estimated H-index: 31
(Indiana University Bloomington)
Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts’ contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript’s contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of t...
6 Citations Source Cite
Published on May 1, 2011in Nursing Research 1.73
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
Source Cite
Published on Nov 1, 2010in Nursing Research 1.73
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2010in Nursing Research 1.73
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
1 Citations Source Cite
Published on Nov 1, 2010in Nursing Ethics 1.88
Marion E. Broome31
Estimated H-index: 31
(Indiana University Bloomington),
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
+ 2 AuthorsJudith Gedney Baggs21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Oregon Health & Science University)
Editors of scientific literature rely heavily on peer reviewers to evaluate the integrity of research conduct and validity of findings in manuscript submissions. The purpose of this study was to describe the ethical concerns of reviewers of nursing journals. This descriptive cross-sectional study was an anonymous online survey. The findings reported here were part of a larger investigation of experiences of reviewers. Fifty-two editors of nursing journals (six outside the USA) agreed to invite t...
13 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2009in Nursing Outlook 2.42
Susan J. Henly21
Estimated H-index: 21
(University of Minnesota),
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
Dissemination of research findings through publication of results in peer reviewed journals is the gold standard in nursing science. Yet, little is known about quality of manuscript reviews or factors associated with review quality. The purpose of this project was to refine a methodology for assessing quality of reviews and then to evaluate review quality. We created a continuous quality improvement process to assess the narrative portion of 464 reviews of 203 manuscripts submitted to Nursing Re...
19 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2009in Journal of Professional Nursing 1.26
Margaret Comerford Freda20
Estimated H-index: 20
(Albert Einstein College of Medicine),
Margaret H. Kearney26
Estimated H-index: 26
(University of Rochester)
+ 2 AuthorsMolly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Topic Nursing journals depend on the services of peer reviewers for their expertise in research and clinical practice. Although some research has been done with peer reviewers of biomedical journals, to date, our knowledge about reviewers of nursing journals is minimal. Methods In this international survey of 1,675 reviewers for 41 nursing journals, reviewers were asked 69 questions about their experiences reviewing for professional nursing journals. This article examines their answers to the su...
27 Citations Source Cite
Published on May 1, 2009in International Journal of Nursing Studies 3.66
Yuan Mei Liao8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Taipei Medical University),
Chyn Yng Yang1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Taipei Medical University)
+ 5 AuthorsLu-I Chang2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Taipei Medical University)
Abstract Background Previous studies about the prevalence and impact of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were focused on urinary incontinence or overactive bladder in the general population. Little research has been focused on the role that the workplace has in employed women's experiences with LUTS or the impact of LUTS on their health-related quality of life (HRQL). Objectives To estimate the prevalence of LUTS among employed female nurses in Taipei and to compare the HRQL for nurses with a...
25 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2009in Nursing Research 1.73
Molly C. Dougherty24
Estimated H-index: 24
1 Citations Source Cite
12345678910