Consistency and Inconsistency in PhD Thesis Examination

Volume: 52, Issue: 1, Pages: 36 - 48
Published: Apr 1, 2008
Abstract
This is a mixed methods investigation of consistency in PhD examination. At its core is the quantification of the content and conceptual analysis of examiner reports for 804 Australian theses. First, the level of consistency between what examiners say in their reports and the recommendation they provide for a thesis is explored, followed by an examination of the degree of discrepancy between examiner recommendations and university committee...
Paper Details
Title
Consistency and Inconsistency in PhD Thesis Examination
Published Date
Apr 1, 2008
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
36 - 48
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.