Original paper
Preference in Random Assignment: Implications for the Interpretation of Randomized Trials
Volume: 36, Issue: 5, Pages: 331 - 342
Published: May 12, 2009
Abstract
Random assignment to a preferred experimental condition can increase service engagement and enhance outcomes, while assignment to a less-preferred condition can discourage service receipt and limit outcome attainment. We examined randomized trials for one prominent psychiatric rehabilitation intervention, supported employment, to gauge how often assignment preference might have complicated the interpretation of findings. Condition descriptions,...
Paper Details
Title
Preference in Random Assignment: Implications for the Interpretation of Randomized Trials
Published Date
May 12, 2009
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
331 - 342
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History