Audience, consequence, and journal selection in toxic-exposure epidemiology
Abstract
Even preliminary toxic-exposure epidemiology papers can spark “media scares” and questionable reactions amongst the public. Concerns for the social consequences of publication can lead epidemiologists—despite the advantages of visible publication—to choose a more obscure outlet for potentially sensitive studies. Interviews with 61 US toxic-exposure epidemiologists indicate that investigators generally sought visible journals to transmit their...
Paper Details
Title
Audience, consequence, and journal selection in toxic-exposure epidemiology
Published Date
Mar 13, 2004
Journal
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
1541 - 1546
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History