Intention Invention and the Affect Misattribution Procedure

Volume: 39, Issue: 3, Pages: 375 - 386
Published: Feb 11, 2013
Abstract
A recent study of the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) found that participants who retrospectively reported that they intentionally rated the primes showed larger effect sizes and higher reliability. The study concluded that the AMP’s validity depends on intentionally rating the primes. We evaluated this conclusion in three experiments. First, larger effect sizes and higher reliability were associated with (incoherent) retrospective reports...
Paper Details
Title
Intention Invention and the Affect Misattribution Procedure
Published Date
Feb 11, 2013
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
375 - 386
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.