The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.

Published on Jan 1, 2015in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
· DOI :10.1037/pspi0000033
Arnold K. Ho17
Estimated H-index: 17
(UM: University of Michigan),
Jim Sidanius60
Estimated H-index: 60
(Harvard University)
+ 5 AuthorsAndrew L. Stewart10
Estimated H-index: 10
(Clark University)
A new conceptualization and measurement of social dominance orientation-individual differences in the preference for group based hierarchy and inequality-is introduced. In contrast to previous measures of social dominance orientation that were designed to be unidimensional, the new measure (SDO7) embeds theoretically grounded subdimensions of SDO-SDO-Dominance (SDO-D) and SDO-Egalitarianism (SDO-E). SDO-D constitutes a preference for systems of group-based dominance in which high status groups forcefully oppress lower status groups. SDO-E constitutes a preference for systems of group-based inequality that are maintained by an interrelated network of subtle hierarchy-enhancing ideologies and social policies. Confirmatory factor and criterion validity analyses confirmed that SDO-D and SDO-E are theoretically distinct and dissociate in terms of the intergroup outcomes they best predict. For the first time, distinct personality and individual difference bases of SDO-D and SDO-E are outlined. We clarify the construct validity of SDO by strictly assessing a preference for dominance hierarchies in general, removing a possible confound relating to support for hierarchy benefitting the ingroup. Consistent with this, results show that among members of a disadvantaged ethnic minority group (African Americans), endorsement of SDO7 is inversely related to ingroup identity. We further demonstrate these effects using nationally representative samples of U.S. Blacks and Whites, documenting the generalizability of these findings. Finally, we introduce and validate a brief 4-item measure of each dimension. This article importantly extends our theoretical understanding of one of the most generative constructs in social psychology, and introduces powerful new tools for its measurement.
  • References (86)
  • Citations (163)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2,460 Citations
2,608 Citations
202 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Jim SidaniusH-Index: 60
#2Sarah CotterillH-Index: 4
Last. Fiona Kate BarlowH-Index: 21
view all 5 authors...
Question: What is the difference between capitalism and communism? Answer: Under capitalism you have the exploitation of man by man. Under communism it is just the reverse. Russian saying Despite impressive gains in the spread of quasi-democratic social practices and respect for human rights witnessed in the past hundred years (e.g., Pinker, 2011), intergroup discrimination, oppression, and violence continue to thrive within every modern social system. Whether one considers the marked discrimina...
30 CitationsSource
#1Nour Kteily (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 18
#2Emile Bruneau (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 19
Last. Sarah Cotterill (Harvard University)H-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
Dehumanization is a central concept in the study of intergroup relations. Yet although theoretical and methodological advances in subtle, "everyday" dehumanization have progressed rapidly, blatant dehumanization remains understudied. The present research attempts to refocus theoretical and empirical attention on blatant dehumanization, examining when and why it provides explanatory power beyond subtle dehumanization. To accomplish this, we introduce and validate a blatant measure of dehumanizati...
96 CitationsSource
#1Matthew B. Kugler (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 8
#2John T. Jost (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 63
Last. Sharareh Noorbaloochi (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative” concerns about the virtues of ingroup loyalty, obedience to authority, and enforcement of purity standards. This proposal clashes with decades of research in political psychology connecting the latter set of characteristics to “the authoritarian personality.” We demonstrate that liberal-conservative differences in moral intuitions are statistic...
60 CitationsSource
#1Paul Hindriks (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 4
#2Maykel Verkuyten (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 50
Last. Marcel Coenders (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
Using a representative sample of Dutch natives, the current study examined the distinction between two dimensions of social dominance orientation [SDO-Dominance (SDO-D) and SDO-Egalitarianism (SDO-E)] and their relation with prejudice towards immigrant groups. Results showed that an empirical distinction between the two dimensions could be made. Furthermore, the relation between SDO and prejudice was fully mediated by hierarchy-enhancing (ethnic citizenship, assimilation) and hierarchy-attenuati...
21 CitationsSource
#1Nour Kteily (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 18
#2Sarah Cotterill (Harvard University)H-Index: 4
Last. Robin Bergh (Uppsala University)H-Index: 8
view all 5 authors...
We investigated individual difference predictors of ascribing ingroup characteristics to negative and positive ambiguous targets. Studies 1 and 2 investigated events involving negative targets whos ...
28 CitationsSource
#1Sarah Cotterill (Harvard University)H-Index: 4
#2Jim Sidanius (Harvard University)H-Index: 60
Last. Vivek Kumar (JNU: Jawaharlal Nehru University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
This paper extends the social dominance perspective to the Indian context by examining the role of belief in Karma (sanchita) in the justification of the Indian caste system. Using social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and the dual process model (Duckitt, 2001) as guiding theoretical frameworks, we tested four related hypotheses within a sample of 385 Indian university students. In particular we expected that social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) wo...
21 CitationsSource
#1Petar Milojev (University of Auckland)H-Index: 11
#2Danny Osborne (University of Auckland)H-Index: 20
Last. Chris G. Sibley (University of Auckland)H-Index: 41
view all 8 authors...
Moral Foundations Theory posits five distinct foundations of morality: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, In-group/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. In combination, this should yield between four-to-six moral signatures—distinct combinations or patterns of support for these aspects of morality. We extend previous research by examining the replicability of these moral signatures in a New Zealand-based national sample (n = 3,635). Latent Profile Analysis identified four distinct moral...
19 CitationsSource
#1Michael C. Ashton (Brock University)H-Index: 50
#2Kibeom Lee (U of C: University of Calgary)H-Index: 47
Last. Reinout E. de Vries (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
We review research and theory on the HEXACO personality dimensions of Honesty-Humility (H), Agreeableness (A), and Emotionality (E), with particular attention to the following topics: (1) the origins of the HEXACO model in lexical studies of personality structure, and the content of the H, A, and E factors in those studies; (2) the operationalization of the H, A, and E factors in the HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised; (3) the construct validity of self-reports on scales measuring the H factor...
204 CitationsSource
#1Moniek Ellenbroek (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 1
#2Maykel Verkuyten (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 50
Last. Edwin Poppe (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
This study examines adolescents' evaluation of the fairness of three forms of democratic decision-making procedures (direct democracy, representative democracy and group representation) and one non-democratic procedure (oligarchy). Social dominance orientation-Egalitarianism (SDO-E), religious group identification and the countries' level of democracy are examined as predictors. The 2008 Europroject dataset was used, which contained 4441 native majority adolescents (mean age = 16.1 years) in 18 ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Borja Martinovic (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 16
#2Maykel Verkuyten (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 50
This paper identifies autochthony—the belief that a place belongs to its original inhabitants and that they are therefore more entitled—as a relevant new determinant of out-group prejudice. We hypothesized that autochthony uniquely predicts prejudice towards migrant groups and that it mediates the relationship between national identification and prejudice. The mediation process was anticipated to be especially strong for people who perceive out-group encroachment, that is, those who feel that im...
28 CitationsSource
Cited By163
Most models predicting collective action for social change have not considered the role of ideology. Recent research suggests, however, that ideology is a key variable in predicting social change efforts by illustrating that conservatives are more likely to resist whereas liberals are more likely to promote social change. In this review, I bring two lines of research together showing that not ony liberals but also right-wing populists are interested in collective action for social change. I intr...
#1Melanie Langer (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 5
#2Pavlos Vasilopoulos (Ebor: University of York)H-Index: 3
Last. John T. Jost (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 63
view all 4 authors...
Because of the legacy of the French Revolution and the post-World War II consensus on providing social welfare, France provides an intriguing context in which to investigate political ideology and system justification. We summarize the results of a large, nationally representative survey of French voters, which revealed that general system justification was associated—not with rightist ideology, as in other countries—but with leftist ideology. That is, self-identified leftists scored higher than...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jae A. Puckett (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 2
#2L. Zachary DuBois (UO: University of Oregon)H-Index: 7
Last. Cylie Hanson (USD: University of South Dakota)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
ABSTRACTTransgender people are exposed to great amounts of discrimination and violence, but research has yet to fully understand what drives stigma towards this community. In this study, we hypothesized that social dominance orientation would be associated with greater gender minority stigma (i.e., stigmatizing views of transgender people), with this association mediated by higher levels of trait aggression and lower levels of critical consciousness. Data were collected online from 254 cisgender...
1 CitationsSource
#1Anne Taillandier-Schmitt (University of Rennes)H-Index: 2
#2Nicolas Combalbert (François Rabelais University)H-Index: 4
Abstract In the literature, several studies have shown that the perpetrator’s ethnic origin and acculturation strategy are particularly influential extrajudicial factors, but authors have focused on highly stigmatized groups. The aim of this study was to examine how the participants’ judgments were influenced by the acculturation strategy of a Vietnamese aggressor (member of a valued minority group in France), the consequences of the act for the victim, and their level of SDO. It was expected th...
#1Virgil Zeigler-Hill (Oakland University)H-Index: 29
#2Jose L. Martinez (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 1
Last. Brianna Kenny (Oakland University)H-Index: 1
view all 8 authors...
Abstract The present studies examined the associations that narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, and spitefulness had with the competitive and dangerous social worldviews as well as the possibility that these worldviews may explain, at least in part, the associations that these dark personality features had with the ideological attitudes of social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). Across three studies (N = 2,103), we found the dark personality featu...
1 CitationsSource
#1Virgil Zeigler-Hill (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 29
#2Destaney Sauls (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 2
Last. Paige Malay (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal (University of Oslo)H-Index: 1
#2Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø (University of Oslo)H-Index: 2
Last. Lotte Ansgaard Thomsen (University of Oslo)H-Index: 51
view all 8 authors...
Moral judgments may be driven by both principled and opportunistic motivations. Being morally principled is to consistently adhere to a single set of rules about morality and justice. Opportunistic morality rather involves selectively enforcing rules when they are beneficial to one9s interests. These two kinds of motivations sometimes pull in the same direction, other times not. Prior studies on moral motivations have mostly focused on principled morality. Opportunistic morality, along with its ...
#1Arnold K. Ho (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 17
#2Nour Kteily (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 18
Whereas social dominance theory has historically been used to understand the dynamics of group-based hierarchy and oppression, it has seldom been used to understand the dynamics of social change toward greater equality. We review a growing body of research that takes seriously the psychology of individuals who are interested in group-based equality and hierarchy challenge – those lower (vs. higher) in social dominance orientation (SDO). This emerging research documents that lower SDO individuals...
#1Felix SeptiantoH-Index: 7
Last. Rebecca DolanH-Index: 6
view all 4 authors...
#1Thomas H. Costello (Emory University)H-Index: 3
#2Shauna M. Bowes (Emory University)H-Index: 3
Last. Scott O. Lilienfeld (Emory University)H-Index: 71
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Philosophers have long speculated that authoritarianism and belief in determinism are functionally related. To evaluate this hypothesis, we assessed whether authoritarianism and allied personality and political variables predict varieties of belief in determinism in three community samples (N1 = 566 to 20,010; N2 = 500; N3 = 419). Authoritarianism and allied variables manifested moderate to large positive correlations with both fatalistic and genetic determinism beliefs. Controlling for...