Match!

ENFOQUES EXPLÍCITOS VERSUS IMPLÍCITOS EN LA ENSEÑANZA DE LA NATURALEZA DE LA CIENCIA

Published on Jan 1, 2009in Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias
· DOI :10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2009.v6.i3.04
José Antonio6
Estimated H-index: 6
,
Acevedo Díaz6
Estimated H-index: 6
Cite
Abstract
En este articulo se analizan los principales enfoques usados en la educacion cientifica para la ensenanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia. Dos enfoques generales pueden ser considerados: implicito y explicito-reflexivo. Se valora la eficacia relativa de ambos enfoques a partir de los resultados obtenidos de su puesta en practica en la ensenanza de las ciencias, y se presta atencion a los supuestos inherentes que subyacen en los mismos. El enfoque explicito-reflexivo se ha mostrado mas eficaz que el enfoque implicito hasta ahora. Sin embargo, se precisa mas conocimiento sobre la eficacia de ambos enfoques en contextos diferentes, por lo que todavia es necesario realizar mas investigaciones sistematicas sobre este asunto. Palabras clave: Ensenanza de las ciencias, naturaleza de la ciencia, enfoque implicito, enfoque explicito y reflexivo. Explicit versus implicit approaches in nature of science teaching In this paper, we analyze the main approaches used in science education for nature of science teaching. Two general approaches could be considered: implicit and explicit-reflexive. We value the relative effectiveness of both approaches through the results of the implementation in science teaching, and we pay attention to underlying inherent assumptions. Up to now, explicit-reflexive approach has been shown more effective that implicit approach. However, more knowledge about the effectiveness of both approaches in different contexts is required. Consequently, is still necessary more systematic research on this question. Key words: Science teaching; nature of science; implicit approach: explicit & reflexive approach.
  • References (144)
  • Citations (13)
Cite
References144
Newest
#1Norman G. Lederman (OSU: Oregon State University)H-Index: 46
#2Reneé S. Schwartz (OSU: Oregon State University)H-Index: 14
Last.Randy L. Bell (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 27
view all 4 authors...
#1Fouad Abd-El-Khalick (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 32
#2Mindy Waters (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 1
Last.An-Phong Le (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
#1Christina Olin-Scheller (NKNU: National Kaohsiung Normal University)H-Index: 2
#2Patrik Wikström (NTUST: National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 2
Cited By13
Newest
#1Ángel Vázquez-Alonso (UIB: University of the Balearic Islands)H-Index: 17
#2Abdiel Aponte (University of Panama)H-Index: 1
Last.Marisa Montesano (UIB: University of the Balearic Islands)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
View next paperViews of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science