Match!

Is risk analysis scientific

Published on Jul 1, 2014in Risk Analysis2.564
· DOI :10.1111/RISA.12230
Sven Ove Hansson41
Estimated H-index: 41
(KTH: Royal Institute of Technology),
E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven1
Estimated H-index: 1
(University of Stavanger),
Terje Aven53
Estimated H-index: 53
(University of Stavanger)
Sources
Abstract
This article discusses to what extent risk analysis is scientific in view of a set of commonly used definitions and criteria. We consider scientific knowledge to be characterized by its subject matter, its success in developing the best available knowledge in its fields of study, and the epistemic norms and values that guide scientific investigations. We proceed to assess the field of risk analysis according to these criteria. For this purpose, we use a model for risk analysis in which science is used as a base for decision making on risks, which covers the five elements evidence, knowledge base, broad risk evaluation, managerial review and judgment, and the decision; and that relates these elements to the domains experts and decisionmakers, and to the domains fact-based or value-based. We conclude that risk analysis is a scientific field of study, when understood as consisting primarily of (i) knowledge about risk-related phenomena, processes, events, etc., and (ii) concepts, theories, frameworks, approaches, principles, methods and models to understand, assess, characterize, communicate, and manage risk, in general and for specific applications (the instrumental part).
  • References (35)
  • Citations (46)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
298 Citations
1,832 Citations
275 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References35
Newest
#1Massimo Pigliucci (CUNY: City University of New York)H-Index: 47
#2Maarten Boudry (CUNY: City University of New York)H-Index: 14
The concept of burden of proof is used in a wide range of discourses, from philosophy to law, science, skepticism, and even in everyday reasoning. This paper provides an analysis of the proper deployment of burden of proof, focusing in particular on skeptical discussions of pseudoscience and the paranormal, where burden of proof assignments are most poignant and relatively clear-cut. We argue that burden of proof is often misapplied or used as a mere rhetorical gambit, with little appreciation o...
18 CitationsSource
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
Last. Bodil S. KrohnH-Index: 1
view all 2 authors...
There are many ways of understanding, assessing and managing the unforeseen and (potential) surprises. The dominating one is the risk approach, based on risk conceptualisation, risk assessment and risk management, but there are also others, and in this paper we focus on two; ideas from the quality discourse and the use of the concept of mindfulness as interpreted in the studies of High Reliability Organisation (HRO). The main aim of the paper is to present a new integrated perspective, a new way...
109 CitationsSource
Two images, "black swans" and "perfect storms," have struck the public's imagination and are used-at times indiscriminately-to describe the unthinkable or the extremely unlikely. These metaphors have been used as excuses to wait for an accident to happen before taking risk management measures, both in industry and government. These two images represent two distinct types of uncertainties (epistemic and aleatory). Existing statistics are often insufficient to support risk management because the s...
146 CitationsSource
#1Louis Anthony Cox (CU: University of Colorado Boulder)H-Index: 20
How can risk analysts help to improve policy and decision making when the correct probabilistic relation between alternative acts and their probable consequences is unknown? This practical challenge of risk management with model uncertainty arises in problems from preparing for climate change to managing emerging diseases to operating complex and hazardous facilities safely. We review constructive methods for robust and adaptive risk analysis under deep uncertainty. These methods are not yet as ...
107 CitationsSource
#1Terje AvenH-Index: 53
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
Last. Enrico Zio (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 57
view all 1 authors...
This is a perspective article on foundational issues in risk assessment and management. The aim is to discuss the needs, obstacles, and challenges for the establishment of a renewed, strong scientific foundation for risk assessment and risk management suited for the current and future technological challenges. The focus is on (i) reviewing and discussing the present situation and (ii) identifying how to best proceed in the future, to develop the risk discipline in the directions needed. The arti...
137 CitationsSource
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
Abstract This paper reviews the definition and meaning of the concept of risk. The review has a historical and development trend perspective, also covering recent years. It is questioned if, and to what extent, it is possible to identify some underlying patterns in the way risk has been, and is being understood today. The analysis is based on a new categorisation of risk definitions and an assessment of these categories in relation to a set of critical issues, including how these risk definition...
275 CitationsSource
#1Bernard D. Goldstein (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 45
10 CitationsSource
#1Adam M. Finkel (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 12
Rethinking risk assessment as a method for helping to solve environmental problems, rather than (merely) understanding environmental hazards, may provide three major classes of benefits over the status quo. First, it can help break the endless cycle of analysis: when the goal is to know enough to decide, rather than to know everything, natural stopping points emerge. Secondly, it can lead to more true decisions about how to achieve risk reduction, rather than mere pronouncements about how much r...
25 CitationsSource
#1Neelke Doorn (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 15
#2Sven Ove Hansson (KTH: Royal Institute of Technology)H-Index: 41
Safety is a concern in almost all branches of engineering. Whereas safety was traditionally introduced by applying safety factors or margins to the calculated maximum load, this approach is increasingly replaced with probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) as a tool for dimensioning safety measures. In this paper, the two approaches are compared in terms of what they aim at and what they can, in fact, achieve. The outcome of this comparison suggests that the two approaches should be seen as compleme...
41 CitationsSource
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
Risk assessments are often criticised for defending activities that could harm the environment and human health. The risk assessments produce numbers which are used to prove that the risk associated with the activity is acceptable. In this way, risk assessments seem to be a tool generally serving business. Government agencies have based their regulations on the use of risk assessment and the prevailing practise is supported by the regulations. In this paper, we look more closely into this critiq...
36 CitationsSource
Cited By46
Newest
This article aims to demonstrate that risk science is important for society, industry and all of us. Rather few people today, including scientists and managers, are familiar with what this science is about-its foundation and main features-and how it is used to gain knowledge and improve communication and decision making in real-life situations. The article seeks to meet this challenge, by presenting three examples, showing how risk science works to gain new generic, fundamental knowledge on risk...
Source
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
Last. Roger Flage (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 12
view all 2 authors...
: Risk analysis as a field and discipline is about concepts, principles, approaches, methods, and models for understanding, assessing, communicating, managing, and governing risk. The foundation of this field and discipline has been subject to continuous discussion since its origin some 40 years ago with the establishment of the Society for Risk Analysis and the Risk Analysis journal. This article provides a perspective on critical foundational challenges that this field and discipline faces tod...
Source
#1Floris Goerlandt (Dal: Dalhousie University)H-Index: 23
#2Jie Li (Shanghai Maritime University)H-Index: 1
Last. Genserik Reniers (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
Risk communication is a significant research domain with practical importance in supporting societal risk governance and informed private decision making. In this article, a high-level analysis of the risk communication research domain is performed using scientometrics methods and visualization tools. Output trends and geographical patterns are identified, and patterns in scientific categories determined. A journal distribution analysis provides insights into dominant journals and the domain’s i...
1 CitationsSource
The purpose of this paper is to generalize the traditional risk evaluation methods and to specify a multi-level risk evaluation framework, in order to prepare customized risk evaluation and to enable effectively integrating the elements of risk evaluation.,A real case study of an electric motor manufacturing company is presented to illustrate the advantages of this new framework compared to the traditional and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) approaches.,The essence of the proposed ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
Abstract Three of the most influential scientific works in the risk field, at least in the engineering environment, are Stan Kaplan and John Garrick's paper from 1981 on risk quantification, George Apostolakis’ paper on probability from 1990, and Elisabeth Pate-Cornell's paper on uncertainty levels in risk assessments from 1996. The present article reviews and discusses these works, the aim being to acknowledge their important contributions to risk science and provide insights on how these works...
3 CitationsSource
#2Olga Yu. Kurtaeva (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia)
With the development of a risk-based approach to management, there is a need for its use in many management processes. Economic safety is no exception. Economic security is closely related to the control function of management. The whole essence of economic security is to prevent risks. The control based on risk is an element of the economic security system. The area of interaction is risk management. Therefore, account and risk analysis can be used at the creation of a system of economic securi...
Source
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
AbstractThis paper provides new knowledge on how to understand and describe climate change risk. This type of risk is of the utmost importance for us all, but current approaches for conceptualizing...
2 CitationsSource
#1Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 53
#1E.B. Abrahamsen and Terje Aven (University of Stavanger)H-Index: 1
Last. Marja Ylönen (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland)H-Index: 2
view all 2 authors...
Abstract Standards like ISO 31000 on risk management are increasingly influencing the risk and safety fields, despite rather strong criticism concerning their quality. In this paper, we perform a thorough discussion of the application of standards in the risk and safety fields, using ISO 31000 as a case to illustrate the argumentation. The aim is to structure and summarise some key knowledge on the role of such standards in the progress and practice of these fields. The discussion addresses the ...
3 CitationsSource
Many philosophers and statisticians argue that risk assessors are morally obligated to evaluate the probabilities and consequences of methodological error, and to base their decisions of whether to adopt a given parameter value, model, or hypothesis on those considerations. This argument is couched within the rubric of null hypothesis testing, which I suggest is a poor descriptive and normative model for risk assessment. Risk regulation is not primarily concerned with evaluating the probability ...
3 CitationsSource
: This article describes how risk has been conceptualized in the business and organizational literature through four distinct transformations: from the techno-scientific perspective to the cognitive, the social-cultural, and, finally, to the constructionist perspective. Each domain conceptualizes risk in different ways, as organizations have found it difficult to understand and mitigate using the risk management tools available. Conceptualizing risk as sensemaking becomes relevant due to the com...
3 CitationsSource