Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances

Published on Feb 1, 2016in European Journal of Operational Research3.81
· DOI :10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032
Emanuele Borgonovo23
Estimated H-index: 23
(Bocconi University),
Elmar Plischke9
Estimated H-index: 9
(TUC: Clausthal University of Technology)
The solution of several operations research problems requires the creation of a quantitative model. Sensitivity analysis is a crucial step in the model building and result communication process. Through sensitivity analysis we gain essential insights on model behavior, on its structure and on its response to changes in the model inputs. Several interrogations are possible and several sensitivity analysis methods have been developed, giving rise to a vast and growing literature. We present an overview of available methods, structuring them into local and global methods. For local methods, we discuss Tornado diagrams, one way sensitivity functions, differentiation-based methods and scenario decomposition through finite change sensitivity indices, providing a unified view of the associated sensitivity measures. We then analyze global sensitivity methods, first discussing screening methods such as sequential bifurcation and the Morris method. We then address variance-based, moment-independent and value of information-based sensitivity methods. We discuss their formalization in a common rationale and present recent results that permit the estimation of global sensitivity measures by post-processing the sample generated by a traditional Monte Carlo simulation. We then investigate in detail the methodological issues concerning the crucial step of correctly interpreting the results of a sensitivity analysis. A classical example is worked out to illustrate some of the approaches.
  • References (188)
  • Citations (166)
#1Qingqing Zhai (Beihang University)H-Index: 12
#2Jun Yang (Beihang University)H-Index: 12
Last.Yu Zhao (Beihang University)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
#1Leigang Zhang (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 4
#2Zhenzhou Lu (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 18
Last.Chongqing Fan (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
#1Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón (Tec: Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education)H-Index: 35
#2Kun-Jen Chung (Shih Chien University)H-Index: 14
Last.Gerardo Treviño-Garza (IBS: International Business School, Germany)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
#1Pengfei Wei (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 9
#2Zhenzhou Lu (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 18
Last.Jingwen Song (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
#1Barry J. Anderson (Bocconi University)H-Index: 2
#2Emanuele Borgonovo (Bocconi University)H-Index: 23
Last.Roberto Roson (Bocconi University)H-Index: 22
view all 4 authors...
Cited By166
#1Luis Bravo-Moncayo (UDLAP: Universidad de las Américas Puebla)H-Index: 1
#2José Lucio-Naranjo (National Technical University)H-Index: 1
Last.Christiam Garzón (UDLAP: Universidad de las Américas Puebla)
view all 5 authors...
#1Pengfei Wei (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)
#2Chenghu Tang (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)
Last.Yuting Yang (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)
view all 3 authors...
#1Tianfeng Hou (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)
#2Dirk Nuyens (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 13
Last.Hans Janssen (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
#1Stef Janssen (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Alexei Sharpanskykh (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 13
Last.Koen Langendoen (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
#1Amalia Pizarro-Alonso (DTU: Technical University of Denmark)H-Index: 1
#2Hans RavnH-Index: 8
Last.Marie Münster (DTU: Technical University of Denmark)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
View next paperA new uncertainty importance measure